On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Ben Bidner b...@vuetec.com wrote:
per the manual, exceptions thrown in an autoload method are swallowed,
and an E_ERROR is triggered by php.
http://us2.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.autoload.php
I have read that note before, and wondered exactly what
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Ben Bidnerb...@vuetec.com wrote:
?php
function autoloader($className)
{
throw new Exception(Fail);
}
spl_autoload_register(autoloader);
The whole point of spl_autoload_register() is to allow programmers to
have several independent autoloaders.
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 20:15, Sandro Tosimo...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 18:43, Sean Coatess...@caedmon.net wrote:
Just another question: may you please list me all the possible
'Status' field values? In particular we are interested in those
'Status'es
PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net/
Num Status Summary (1437 total -- which includes 883 feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
48597 Open Unclosed array keys break space escaping in $_GET/POST/REQUEST
48612 Open
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net/
Num Status Summary (85 total -- which includes 38 feature requests)
===[*Unicode Issues]==
48265 Open Source and result of database have different encodings.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smithm...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
Hi,
I recommend that you sign up on the wiki and publish your proposal on
wiki.php.net/rfc
regards,
Lukas
Added at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/boxingandunboxing
--
Joshua Thompson
Mechanical Engineer/Software
On Jul 6, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
The migration guide states that The use of {} to access string
offsets
is deprecated. Use [] instead. but the code in zend_compile.c is
commented out with #ifdef ilia_0.
What's the take on this? Will it be deprecated later or should
On 04.07.2009, at 22:08, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 04.07.2009, at 21:10, Paul Biggar paul.big...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Lukas Kahwe
Smithm...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
I can't see the difference between your proposal and the
conclusion I
reached yesterday?
Hi Lukas,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smithm...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
Ok, I have updated the RFC now with a table that shows that I expect to pass
and fail. Its fairly late, so I might have missed something. In general what
I am proposing is more lax than is_*() for the most
Last week or so there was a fairly detailed discussion on the
internals list regarding type hinting based on my original patch.
Since then the patch has been revised to address the major concerns
that were identified (breakage of binary compatibility) as well
extended with additional
2009/7/6 Ilia Alshanetsky i...@prohost.org:
I would like to ask all developers to voice their opinions of whether it
makes sense to add this to 5.3 or to throw it away (either one is fine btw).
To keep the process simple flamewar free, please restrict yourself to +/-
(1/0), next week monday
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Ilia Alshanetskyi...@prohost.org wrote:
Last week or so there was a fairly detailed discussion on the internals list
regarding type hinting based on my original patch. Since then the patch has
been revised to address the major concerns that were identified
+1
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Eddie Drapkinoorza...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Ilia Alshanetskyi...@prohost.org wrote:
Last week or so there was a fairly detailed discussion on the internals list
regarding type hinting based on my original patch. Since then the
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Ilia Alshanetskyi...@prohost.org wrote:
I would like to ask all developers to voice their opinions of whether it
makes sense to add this to 5.3 or to throw it away (either one is fine btw).
To keep the process simple flamewar free, please restrict yourself to
Hi,
I recently found the jit compiler for php
(http://pecl.php.net/package/llvm). Are there any information avaible on
this project?
I just found that the student 'dropped out' of the project, but from
then, nothing. Does anyone know which version of llvm this needs to
compile (and which
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Ilia Alshanetskyi...@prohost.org wrote:
Last week or so there was a fairly detailed discussion on the internals list
regarding type hinting based on my original patch. Since then the patch has
been revised to address the major concerns that were identified
16 matches
Mail list logo
