On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
Sure, I'm fine with that - just wanted to make sure the urgent need to
fix showstoppers was well understood. I realize there are other
considerations in play.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
>
>> +1 for a 5.3.1 release ASA
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
> +1 for a 5.3.1 release ASAP.
Cool down please. I was not asking to delay 5.3.1 for months but a
week or two maximum. There is always plenty of bugs to justify an
immediate release, a week or two later for the RC1 won't change
anything and w
On Aug 7, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Lewis Wright wrote:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
for me too. this bug makes 5.3.0 unusable for me. svn is not an
option for
production environment.
Thanks,
Andre
On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
2009/8/7 Andre Hübner
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
>>> release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
>>>
>>
> for me too. this bug makes 5.3.0 unusable for me. svn is not an option for
> production environment.
>
> Thanks,
> Andre
>
>
>
Y
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
for me too. this bug makes 5.3.0 unusable for me. svn is not an option for
production environment.
Thanks,
Andre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
On 28.07.2009, at 19:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
David Zülke wrote:
On 28.07.2009, at 13:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi David,
I took only a quick look, but I like the patch.
In case it doesn't break any tests, it should be committed at
least into
HEAD. I agree to commit it
Translating and maintaining the documentation
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48880 is reason enough to want a
release soon - PHP 5.3 died a very fast death in production here.
--
Tom Boutell
P'unk Avenue
215 755 1330
punkave.com
window.punkave.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php
>> Does no one see the inherent issues in buying a book about a
>> not-feature-complete version of the language?
>
> I suspect in 2007/8 Larry thought that PHP6 was actually going to be
> released some time soon, rather than inventing a new roadblock with PHP5.3 -
> which is what the book now needs
Top poster!
And Windows only bugs are not critical. That error_log crash alone
should have caused an immediate release weeks ago..
--Jani
On 08/07/2009 01:06 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi Johannes,
I do not have the chance to match this planning. I'll be back from
holidays on Monday and will w
Team GBTX LTD wrote:
Greetings
I am trying to build a local server environment for my web development
projects (I also try to get oscommerce working) . In order to achieve this I
downloaded XAMPP but this software package appears to be still in
development, full of bugs and incompatibilities. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
