Hi,
A mere year after releasing Version 5.3.0 (Version 5.3.0 30-June-2009)
you are dropping PHP 5.2 support.
This is a very interesting decision as 5.3.0, compatibility wise, is a
major release. I always felt it was PHP 6.0 but it was not called so
because there was a development branched called
hi,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Karoly Negyesi kar...@negyesi.net wrote:
Hi,
A mere year after releasing Version 5.3.0 (Version 5.3.0 30-June-2009)
you are dropping PHP 5.2 support.
We still support 5.2.
There is a huge misunderstanding of end of active support. It means
that only
Where previously the function would accept the by-value argument, a
fatal error is now emitted.
Not sure about this one. Do you have an example please?
Erm, you do realized that I copied that from the handbook page? Example:
?php
function a($x) {}
a(NULL);
?
PHP Fatal error: Only variables
Extensions. APC to this day does not have a stable release for PHP
5.3. Neither has XCache. I am not even sure how do you imagine
*anyone* much less everyone upgrading to 5.3 with a production site
without a stable code cache...?
Sorry, apparently XCache 1.3 version does work with 5.3 it's
hi,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Karoly Negyesi kar...@negyesi.net wrote:
Where previously the function would accept the by-value argument, a
fatal error is now emitted.
Not sure about this one. Do you have an example please?
Erm, you do realized that I copied that from the handbook
Am 25.07.2010 11:44, schrieb Karoly Negyesi:
Where previously the function would accept the by-value argument, a
fatal error is now emitted.
Not sure about this one. Do you have an example please?
Erm, you do realized that I copied that from the handbook page? Example:
?php
function
Am 25.07.2010 11:17, schrieb Karoly Negyesi:
This is a very interesting decision as 5.3.0, compatibility wise, is a
major release. I always felt it was PHP 6.0 but it was not called so
because there was a development branched called that (which was later
abandoned).
This is simply not true
I really do not understand you
First you would like to see a incomatible change
without any sense because you do not like some code
On the other hand you are crying about the changes in 5.3
because your code which can not live with it since
you ignored warnings long time ago
So this sounds like
hi Reindl,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
I really do not understand you
Please do not top post and (re) consider the tone of your posts, in
general. It could be a language barrier but we are here to discuss
technical issues in the most friendly
Hello
2010/7/25 Karoly Negyesi kar...@negyesi.net:'
Extensions. APC to this day does not have a stable release for PHP
5.3. Neither has XCache. I am not even sure how do you imagine
*anyone* much less everyone upgrading to 5.3 with a production site
without a stable code cache...?
You
Le 25/07/2010 17:15, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
Hello
2010/7/25 Karoly Negyesikar...@negyesi.net:'
Extensions. APC to this day does not have a stable release for PHP
5.3. Neither has XCache. I am not even sure how do you imagine
*anyone* much less everyone upgrading to 5.3 with a
I said 'stable'. Last I have seen http://pecl.php.net/package/apc the
latest stable was 3.0.19.
Regards
Karoly Negyesi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
So this sounds like bc does not interest me as long it affects
me personally
You have this backwards. BC surely interests me but there is no BC,
there is only a pretense of BC so why not break it as we see fit? And
because of this pretense I have asked not to stop supporting PHP 5.2.
Regards
On 25.07.2010, at 18:05, Karoly Negyesi wrote:
So this sounds like bc does not interest me as long it affects
me personally
You have this backwards. BC surely interests me but there is no BC,
there is only a pretense of BC so why not break it as we see fit? And
because of this pretense I
14 matches
Mail list logo
