Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Lester Caine
David Muir wrote: FWIW, PEAR is already moving to GitHub. So who dictated that There should at least be a little consistency in PHP and this is just another example of everybody just doing what they want and sod the rest of us :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL -

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: David Muir wrote: FWIW, PEAR is already moving to GitHub. So who dictated that There should at least be a little consistency in PHP and this is just another example of everybody just doing what they want and sod

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread dukeofgaming
The only think that worries me is that most of the time people choose the service and not the tool. On one hand you have Mercurial, a more than capable DVCS with the lowest barrier of entry IMHO (you will love it while you learn it), and the very good service that is Bitbucket, now kind of

Re: [PHP-DEV] ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor()

2011-08-26 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Sebastian Bergmann sebast...@php.net wrote:  I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that  implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create an  object a class without invoking the constructor.  As there are

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
If I could vote I'd vote for mercurial, but then again, I bet having PHP on github will increase contributions very quickly. which is pointless if we can't easily accept/merge the pull requests from the github clone. :/ git itself is a powerful tool, but as AFAIK most of the people in this

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Ryan McCue
Ferenc Kovacs wrote: which is pointless if we can't easily accept/merge the pull requests from the github clone. :/ You can very easily accept pull requests from GitHub even if you're not working on GitHub. e.g. I've been working on my own PHP fork, and have submitted a pull request to the PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor()

2011-08-26 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Am 26.08.2011 09:51, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: would this method give the same result as unserialize(O:8:\stdClass\:0:{}) for example? That is the whole point of it, yes. -- Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal Consultant http://sebastian-bergmann.de/

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Lester Caine
Ferenc Kovacs wrote: - which vcs would you prefer to use for your current work on the php project - which vcs will you continue to use what ever anybody else thinks you should be using? I'm running hg into github transparently for those projects that have already jumped lemming like ... and

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Brett Bieber
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: David Muir wrote: FWIW, PEAR is already moving to GitHub. So who dictated that There should at least be a little consistency in PHP and this is

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control systemfor PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Justin Rovang
Now hold on a sec - It's ok to vote to determine the fate of PHP development - for the entire PHP-lovin' world. Yet, it's not ok to vote for the handful of developers to collaborate? Three weeks of discussion (based on what I've seen here on the list) seems not enough for such a heavy change.

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control systemfor PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Pierre Joye
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Justin Rovang justin.rov...@minnesota.edu wrote: Now hold on a sec - It's ok to vote to determine the fate of PHP development - for the entire PHP-lovin' world. Yet, it's not ok to vote for the handful of developers to collaborate? Three weeks of discussion

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Choosing a distributed version control system for PHP

2011-08-26 Thread Stefan Neufeind
I'm fine with git and I think moving to something like that together with up-to-date tools to contribute (or review patches etc.) will help a lot. But I would prefer to keep the (core) infrastructure at PHP internally. It's just *so* much easier to integrate tools, add things like hooks for the

[PHP-DEV] ext_skel on Fedora

2011-08-26 Thread Aaron Gray
I cannot seem to find 'ext_skel' or 'PECL_Gen' on my F11 instillation of php-devel ? Aaron -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext_skel on Fedora

2011-08-26 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 08/26/2011 05:09 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: I cannot seem to find 'ext_skel' or 'PECL_Gen' on my F11 instillation of php-devel ? No idea what F11 does, but it is in the source tarball. Just download it from php.net. -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext_skel on Fedora

2011-08-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.08.2011 02:09, schrieb Aaron Gray: I cannot seem to find 'ext_skel' or 'PECL_Gen' on my F11 instillation of php-devel? Fedora 11 is EOL since a bunch of releases time and has PHP 5.2.x 5.2.x is EOL too - consider update your systems from time to time signature.asc Description:

Re: [PHP-DEV] ext_skel on Fedora

2011-08-26 Thread Aaron Gray
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote in message news:4e583c6a.3000...@thelounge.net... Ah right, did not think it was that old, thanks, got new servers ready to go in, Aaron -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php