On 09/28/2011 02:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
Please provide a short (10 lines max) but complete reproduce script.
At the moment your explanations do not make any sense.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
---
http://pinba.org - realtime profiling for PHP
--
PHP Internals -
Am 28.09.2011 08:01, schrieb Antony Dovgal:
On 09/28/2011 02:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
Please provide a short (10 lines max) but complete reproduce script.
At the moment your explanations do not make any sense.
what do you think was the content of my last
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
$tmp_name = str_replace(\\, '/', tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv'));
Side note: this is never necessary, php does it for you. Unless you
store paths yourself before calling a php file function.
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye
Am 28.09.2011 09:28, schrieb Pierre Joye:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
$tmp_name = str_replace(\\, '/', tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv'));
Side note: this is never necessary, php does it for you. Unless you
store paths yourself before
hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
First, all you need to test is:
$tempfile = tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv');
$fp = fopen($tempfile , 'w');
* /tmp MUST NOT be in open_basedir
* the temp-folder must be read only
* QUESTION1: why is tempnam()
Am 28.09.2011 10:46, schrieb Pierre Joye:
hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
First, all you need to test is:
$tempfile = tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv');
$fp = fopen($tempfile , 'w');
* /tmp MUST NOT be in open_basedir
* the temp-folder
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but it is wrong to create a file outside the open_basedir especially
if a full qualified directory was passed where it should be created
Forgot to mention that this behavior is clearly documented:
Am 28.09.2011 10:53, schrieb Pierre Joye:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
without any param /tmp is right but not as magical fallback and in
my opinion a well desigend webapp should never touch global /tmp
shared with other hosts and
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
PLEASE READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES BEFORE SCREAMING:
http://se.php.net/mailing-lists.php
Be sure to click Reply-All to reply to list. Clicking Reply will
email the author of the message
Am 28.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Hannes Magnusson:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
PLEASE READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES BEFORE SCREAMING:
http://se.php.net/mailing-lists.php
please configure the mailing-list correct
please
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 16:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Hannes Magnusson:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
PLEASE READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES BEFORE SCREAMING:
please configure the mailing-list correct
please add a hint that modern clients have a reply-to-list
for the record, I don't have that in gmail.
please add a hint that the sender should be removed after
reply-all because internals@lists.php.net is reaching the
list AND the sender of the
Reindl, please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The list is configured correctly.
On 09/28/2011 07:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Hannes Magnusson:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO
Am 28.09.2011 17:03, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
please configure the mailing-list correct
please add a hint that modern clients have a reply-to-list
for the record, I don't have that in gmail.
please add a hint that the sender should be removed after
reply-all because
Hi Reindl!
Do you realize that you are currently spamming hundreds of people that
have subscribed this mailing list with pointless meta-discussions
about how you think mailing list should work? The previous answer have
already explained in detail why *all* mailing lists (this is not
something
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
well if there would be used Reply-To-Headers
tell me ONE reason to get every answer twice
I don't get two emails in gmail, I don't know that the list is smart
enough to not send emails those who are to or cc'ed, or maybe it's a
gmail feature.
That's a gmail (mis)feature.
2011/9/28 Ángel González keis...@gmail.com:
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
well if there would be used Reply-To-Headers
tell me ONE reason to get every answer twice
I don't get two emails in gmail, I don't know that the list is smart
enough to not send emails those who are to or cc'ed, or maybe it's
Hi!
That's a gmail (mis)feature.
If you receive an email twice, it is collapsed into one.
I actually don't get emails twice when replied to personally and on the
list too... Not gmail, exchange+Thunderbird, no idea who of them does it
but I'm OK with it.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
A benefit of being addressed in the email that hasn't been mentioned yet,
johannes mentioned it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg53737.html
Yes, I noticed it /after/ sending. :(
Our emails were alike. We mentioned the same usage pattern and both
19 matches
Mail list logo
