Hi!
On 10/19/11 3:23 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
What about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call?
I'm not sure what would be the use case for that... But if people need
it, and there's no objections, I don't see any danger in including it.
If we do, we need tests though!
--
Stanislav
Mario Brandt wrote:
I already made some benchmarking 5.3.8 and 5.4.0beta2
OK running it via Apache ;) ( '\n' - 'br /' )
Machine is a Dual Core AMD64 laptop (2.1GHz with 1.1GHz memory)
On 64bit Windows 7 Home
32bit Apache + 32bit PHP
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=MS6H4A5g
166.947 Seconds
Am 21.10.2011 13:00, schrieb Lester Caine:
So I suppose the question I have to ask is what the f**k am I doing wrong on
the windows setup?
I've always known that linux was faster, but 4 times faster on the same
hardware? My main development
machine is giving 27.750 seconds which is even
Hi!
On 10/21/11 4:00 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
So I suppose the question I have to ask is what the f**k am I doing wrong on the
windows setup? I've always known that linux was faster, but 4 times faster on
the same hardware? My main development machine is giving 27.750 seconds which is
even
Stas Malyshev wrote:
So I suppose the question I have to ask is what the f**k am I doing wrong on the
windows setup? I've always known that linux was faster, but 4 times faster on
the same hardware? My main development machine is giving 27.750 seconds which is
even nicer,
CPU-bound ops should
Stas Malyshev wrote:
So I suppose the question I have to ask is what the f**k am I doing
wrong on the windows setup? I've always known that linux was faster,
but 4 times faster on the same hardware? My main development
machine
is giving 27.750 seconds which is even nicer,
CPU-bound
It appears that all three of these functions do not return false on
error as they should if the stream is not flushed successfully. Yipes!
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60110
Am I missing something here?
It's especially bad with, say, an S3 stream wrapper that wants to
write the whole thing
Stephen Zarkos stephen.zar...@microsoft.com writes:
Stas Malyshev wrote:
So I suppose the question I have to ask is what the f**k am I doing
wrong on the windows setup? I've always known that linux was faster,
but 4 times faster on the same hardware? My main development
machine
is
Stephen Zarkos wrote:
Stas Malyshev wrote:
So I suppose the question I have to ask is what the f**k am I doing
wrong on the windows setup? I've always known that linux was faster,
but 4 times faster on the same hardware? My main development
machine
is giving 27.750 seconds
-Original Message-
From: Richard Riley [mailto:rile...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 1:04 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Benchmarking ...
Stephen Zarkos stephen.zar...@microsoft.com writes:
Apache does tend to be slower on Windows.
You
Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS
release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by
Canonical for 5 years. Because of this, I really want to ship a version
of PHP that has an is_a() behavior that will be consistent with any
future 5.3.x
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 13:52 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
The release date is April 26 2012, can anyone tell me if 5.3.9 is
expected
by then?
Yes. 5.3.9 release cycle will start soon. Probably next week. So by
April it is certainly there. I assume even 5.3.10 will be released by
then.
Ideally
Stephen Zarkos wrote:
Yes, I do:) Although the tests we've done are a bit different from this sort
of benchmark. We typically do more load testing, where we have one or more
load agent(s) each creating multiple virtual clients accessing one or more PHP
pages on another physical server.
On 10/21/2011 4:42 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
Stephen Zarkos wrote:
Yes, I do:) Although the tests we've done are a bit different from this
sort of
benchmark. We typically do more load testing, where we have one or more
load agent(s)
each creating multiple virtual clients accessing one or
14 matches
Mail list logo
