On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:20:41 +0100, Adir Kuhn adirk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
today I read this post, I think that some points are valid, follow the
link for you guys
http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/
This is really long. I stopped reading in full
Hi!
Another important thing i didn't mention - there is a lot of test fixes
going to be commited, they should be merged into release branches too.
Test fixes are definitely not critical bugs. So I would prefer handling
them as usual fixes.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM:
2012/4/10 Nikita Popov nikita@googlemail.com
Hey internals!
Currently the empty() language construct only works on variables. You
can write if (empty($array)) but not empty if (empty(getSomeArray()).
The original reason for this restriction probably is that - in a way -
it doesn't make
On 4/10/12 4:53 PM, Tom Boutell t...@punkave.com wrote:
Please see:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/source_files_without_opening_tag
After following the discussion I have updated the RFC with the
following major changes:
* Forbade the use of ? entirely in pure PHP files (without
restricting it at all
Sent from my iPad
在 2012-4-11，6:54，Nikita Popov nikita@googlemail.com 写道：
Hey internals!
Currently the empty() language construct only works on variables. You
can write if (empty($array)) but not empty if (empty(getSomeArray()).
The original reason for this restriction probably is that
From: yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yasuo Ohgaki
Hi,
It seems motivation of this RFC is better to be stated.
Motivation to have this RFC is
1. File Includes is fatal security breach.
2. The reason why PHP is unsecure to File Include than other language is
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
This shouldn't be used to load libraries that dump raw HTML output! That
literally defeats the entire purpose. You're also assuming that all PHP
developers do 100% of their coding through pre-existing frameworks.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
Well, technically it's discussion /and/ vote. I know we've been wanting
to get out of the habit of push first, ask later, which is precisely
what RFC helps us avoid. Personally, I think any commits for a
Hi!
btw, It is not a realy issue as we won't use 5.4.1 tests to test the
release but 5.4's branch ones. Too many false positive.
Who are we? I'll definitely be using 5.4.1, since that's what I will be
releasing. There's no point in testing code different from one you're
releasing. Do you mean
