imo it is already covered by
https://wiki.php.net/vcs/gitfaq#multiple_working_copies_workflow
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Alan Knowles a...@akbkhome.com wrote:
Saw this mentioned on one of the blogs comments today.
Ah.. Missed that, I only saw the workflow page which I just noticed
fleetingly mentions that there are alternative work flows in the faq.
regards
Alan
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
imo it is already covered by
Why not?
It's convenient to assign an empty array to a property in this manner.
private $storage = array();
So why not
private $storage = new ArrayObject();
Doing stuff like this in class definition vs in constructor just makes code
look cleaner.
Dmitri Snytkine
Web Developer
Ultra
For variables, it's not very useful. For expressions, might allow to
avoid some boilerplate code - for the same reason we allow expressions
in function calls - we might ban that, and have people assign
expressions to variables and then use variables for function calls, but
we recognize it is
I have an account on wiki.php.net (I don't remember signing up on
docuwiki, only the svn account page, but its there already and linked to
my email address on this list.) I can't seem to reset my password.
When I get the email for the password reset, the wiki.php.net page tells me:
*
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 3:39 PM
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, John Crenshaw johncrens...@priacta.com
wrote:
On top of this, there's an argument that you're not addressing: most
template engines in PHP either directly consume PHP template files...
or compile templates
hi,
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Ralph Schindler
ra...@ralphschindler.com wrote:
I have an account on wiki.php.net (I don't remember signing up on docuwiki,
only the svn account page, but its there already and linked to my email
address on this list.) I can't seem to reset my password.
John Crenshaw wrote:
I think that covered just about everything quite tidily John. Certainly a lot
more succinct than I would have managed!
Well put ...
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services -
Hi all,
There are many different use cases were in code we expect classes names
as arguments to functions as fully qualified names. We do this in ZF a
lot with our Service Location and DI components, but also with our code
reflection API, etc. A more interesting use case I would like to
Hi!
Help me understand, b/c I am not clear what you mean by we allow
expressions in function calls. This is my immediate understanding of
the anatomy of a closure:
Function call:
f($a, $b+$c);
Closure:
$x = function ($arg) use($a, $b+$c as $bplusc) {
/*...*/
}
For the same reason we
From: Arvids Godjuks arvids.godj...@gmail.com
To: Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
Cc: PHP internals list internals@lists.php.net, Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:26:16 +0300
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] New .phpp File Type for Pure-Code PHP Scripts
Well, I just
Hi!
It's convenient to assign an empty array to a property in this manner.
private $storage = array();
So why not
private $storage = new ArrayObject();
array is a static constant. Objects have complex behavior. So it's
better to handle this in ctor. I see no value in splitting ctor into
Hi,
2012/4/15 Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk:
the closing tag isn't even
required to begin with, so you can really think of ?php as a 5-byte
file-header.
If it is supposed to exist always at the beginning of files.
Anyway, file extension should not matter and it should be
a configuration
I used to implement `public static function getClass() { return
get_called_class(); }`, so I really like this one, makes it also easier for
IDEs when refactoring code :)
I was wondering about `class A { const CLASS = 'hello'; }` but that would
cause an unexpected `T_CLASS`, so I guess there's no
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk wrote:
From: Arvids Godjuks arvids.godj...@gmail.com
To: Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
Cc: PHP internals list internals@lists.php.net, Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:26:16 +0300
Subject:
Am 14.04.2012 23:14, schrieb Marco Pivetta:
I used to implement `public static function getClass() { return
get_called_class(); }`, so I really like this one, makes it also easier for
IDEs when refactoring code :)
I was wondering about `class A { const CLASS = 'hello'; }` but that would
cause
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:29 AM, John Crenshaw johncrens...@priacta.comwrote:
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 3:39 PM
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, John Crenshaw
johncrens...@priacta.com wrote:
On top of this, there's an argument that you're not addressing:
most
template
Let me say that I've been following this thread for some time now and what I'm
seeing is a lot of poorly communicated ideas with very little thought
and a lot of
snappy retort.
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. Just because more immediate
concerns exist doesn't mean that looking at
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Sherif Ramadan theanomaly...@gmail.comwrote:
Let me say that I've been following this thread for some time now and what
I'm
seeing is a lot of poorly communicated ideas with very little thought
and a lot of
snappy retort.
We can walk and chew gum at the
Kris Craig wrote:
Please review these things, *then *post a response. Thank you.
If you want this SO badly, just fork a copy of PHP and implement it how you want
it. That is at least the good thing to come out of moving the code management
yet again ... if others want it as well they can
Kris,
It's worth noting that there are already two other similar RFCs that have
been proposed and other people have expressed interest in this idea. Most
of the opposition on this thread has come from 2 people, one of whom has
been mostly posting hyperbolic claims and scare tactics. There
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Kris Craig wrote:
Please review these things, *then *post a response. Thank you.
If you want this SO badly, just fork a copy of PHP and implement it how
you want it. That is at least the good thing to come out of
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.comwrote:
Kris,
It's worth noting that there are already two other similar RFCs that have
been proposed and other people have expressed interest in this idea.
Most
of the opposition on this thread has come from 2 people,
Please review these things, *then *post a response. Thank you.
--Kris
Alright, perhaps we should address one thing at a time. Since you feel
you are repeating yourself I will alleviate repetition with manageable
questions that are fair and concise. I start reading your RFC and the
very
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Sherif Ramadan theanomaly...@gmail.comwrote:
Please review these things, *then *post a response. Thank you.
--Kris
Alright, perhaps we should address one thing at a time. Since you feel
you are repeating yourself I will alleviate repetition with
Kris,
You do realize you just proved my point, right? I said that, because only a
small few people were actually participating in this thread, it would be
completely disingenuous for one side or the other to claim to represent the
majority opinion. The fact that you stepped in does not
Can someone help out with the pear-cvs mailing list, either Daniel or
Gwynne has made some serious change in the setup of packages on github.
This is causing the list to get spammed by ~ 1000 per day at present by
commit messages from migrated changes.
It's probably just best to block github
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.comwrote:
Kris,
You do realize you just proved my point, right? I said that, because
only a
small few people were actually participating in this thread, it would be
completely disingenuous for one side or the other to
Kris,
As discussed on other threads, PHPP files that are called directly from the
webserver are handled by the SAPI handler and thus don't need any special
identification.
Except that they do. Right now, SAPI handlers just invoke PHP. So
there would need to be some way of communicating the
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.comwrote:
Kris,
As discussed on other threads, PHPP files that are called directly from
the
webserver are handled by the SAPI handler and thus don't need any special
identification.
Except that they do. Right now, SAPI
30 matches
Mail list logo
