On 21/05/2012 06:45, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi Zoe,
Thanks for undertaking this project!
I just have a few concerns about this:
- The speedup seems a bit low to me. Maybe with a higher number of
extensions enabled it will improve?..
I don't think it will improve with a higher number of extensions.
Hi,
nice work, out of curiosity I tried on a VM with 24 virtual cores:
Sequential new phpruntests: 29.6 seconds
Parallel -z 4: 12.1 - 12.3 secs
Parallel -z 8: 10.6 - 10.9 secs
Parallel -z 16: 10.6 - 11.3 secs
Parallel -z 24: 10.9 - 11.7 secs
Btw I'm seeing this error:
PHP Warning: Invalid
On 21/05/2012 08:59, Devis Lucato wrote:
Hi,
nice work, out of curiosity I tried on a VM with 24 virtual cores:
Sequential new phpruntests: 29.6 seconds
Parallel -z 4: 12.1 - 12.3 secs
Parallel -z 8: 10.6 - 10.9 secs
Parallel -z 16: 10.6 - 11.3 secs
Parallel -z 24: 10.9 - 11.7 secs
Cool -
Hi,
it recently came to my attention that the function whitelist and blacklist
feature inside Suhosin is easily bypassable since PHP 5.0.
The reason for this is that PHP is no longer calling the
zend_execute_internal() hook if a function is called from another function (via
On Mon, 21 May 2012, Stefan Esser wrote:
While this has no immediate impact for average PHP users, it basically
kills the possibility for an extension like Suhosin to catch all
function starts. This should also be a problem for your DTRACE
support. And IIRC Xdebug was hooking this point
Sent from my iPhone
在 2012-5-21，18:42，Stefan Esser stefan.es...@sektioneins.de 写道：
Hi,
it recently came to my attention that the function whitelist and blacklist
feature inside Suhosin is easily bypassable since PHP 5.0.
The reason for this is that PHP is no longer calling the
Hi,
While this has no immediate impact for average PHP users, it basically kills
the possibility for an extension like Suhosin to catch all function starts.
Actually, there is one, use user opcode handler hook the fcall series
opcodes, that is how I did in taint extension.
From what I can
发自我的 iPad
在 2012-5-21，21:05，Stefan Esser stefan.es...@sektioneins.de 写道：
Hi,
While this has no immediate impact for average PHP users, it basically
kills the possibility for an extension like Suhosin to catch all function
starts.
Actually, there is one, use user opcode handler hook the
I just realized something that never occurred to me before - every
property is actually stored as a hash.
This test-script will demonstrate:
?php
define('NUM_TESTS', 1000);
$before = memory_get_usage(true);
$test = array();
class Foo
{
public
Hi!
How come it's necessary to store the property-names of every property
in every object? For properties that have been defined in classes, why
can't they be stored in a more efficient manner? (using lookup tables)
No because you can add and remove properties freely at runtime.
I know the
Yeah, dynamic properties get used by default every time you
json_decode something, to take a random example.
String folding could be used, but that would require a hashtable
lookup and would probably be slower than allocation (at least until
you started to swap). Worth testing maybe.
Or... when
On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:51 +0200, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk
wrote:
I just realized something that never occurred to me before - every
property is actually stored as a hash.
This test-script will demonstrate:
[snip]
The test-script contains no information about the version of
On Mon, May 14, 2012 1:47 pm, David Rueter wrote:
I am interested in preserving the complete PHP context for a thread
(globals,
variables, interpreter, etc.--everything) for later access from a
different
thread.
What would be involved in this? It seems like:
1) Avoid calling
Thanks for clarifying that. Sounds like a huge win.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:47:51 +0200, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk
wrote:
I just realized something that never occurred to me before - every
property is
I ran this script on 5.3.13, and it reported:
786432 bytes used
On 5.4.3, it reported:
262144 bytes used
That is definitely a significant improvement.
Objects are still a lot bigger than their contents. I don't expect
they would ever shrink to the size of their contents exactly or even
all
Hi!
262144 bytes used
That is definitely a significant improvement.
Objects are still a lot bigger than their contents. I don't expect
they would ever shrink to the size of their contents exactly or even
all that close of course.
Hashtables and zvals have overhead. So if you store
Hi Rafael,
hope it’s ok I've reopened the vote temporarily, but you’ve got the missing
vote.
Am 21.05.2012 um 01:05 schrieb Rafael Dohms:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
See the previous mails, as long as other voters agree to change their
votes
Adding/removing properties at runtime is great if you want obscure,
unmaintainable code and don't think an IDE is useful.
So to make my previous statement more precise, dynamic properties are
not widely used in respectable modern codebases, and is generally
something a reputable developer would
Rasmus, isn't your concern about the impact of dynamic property
support on developers who don't actually use it a nonissue in 5.4,
where properties that aren't dynamic are stored as a flat array?
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk wrote:
Adding/removing properties
First, I'd like to announce the native implementation is available on
github:
https://github.com/cataphract/php-src/compare/array_part
Please review this feature BEFORE voting starts. Unless something comes up
that has to be dealt with until then, I want to start voting on Monday,
28th
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Lars Strojny l...@strojny.net wrote:
Hi Rafael,
hope it’s ok I've reopened the vote temporarily, but you’ve got the missing
vote.
Even better, get this on clean papers. thanks.
But i would still like Pierre and others involved with voting to clear
up the
On Mon, 21 May 2012 23:18:03 +0200, Rafael Dohms
lis...@rafaeldohms.com.br wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Lars Strojny l...@strojny.net wrote:
hope it’s ok I've reopened the vote temporarily, but you’ve got the
missing vote.
Even better, get this on clean papers. thanks.
But
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
There is nothing unclear about a 2/3 majority is required. 2/3 of all the
votes need not be a integer, but that doesn't mean you can't compare it to
an integer. If this still doesn't answer your question, please
What about a magic interface instead of a new base class, in a similar
vein to the existing Array Access and Serializable interfaces.
NonDynamic perhaps?
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Tom Boutell t...@punkave.com wrote:
Rasmus, isn't your concern about the impact of dynamic property
support
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 23:48 +0200, Rafael Dohms wrote:
So we are counting half people now, good i hear Tyrion the Imp going
around internals, good.
I tried to stay away from voting but well, simple math: Assume 5 votes.
Then 3 is less then 2/3 of all votes and 4 is at least 2/3 (more
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Rafael Dohms lis...@rafaeldohms.com.brwrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt
wrote:
There is nothing unclear about a 2/3 majority is required. 2/3 of all
the
votes need not be a integer, but that doesn't mean you
oh, wow! so this was already implemented in 5.4, and without introducing
some kind of base-class to enable it. who knew... fantastic, thanks for the
info!
case closed :-)
- Rasmus
From: Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt
To: internals@lists.php.net
Cc:
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 21:13:52 +0200
Ah, this is why one should trust a coder over a butler:
http://www.ask.com/answers/112530521/5-people-are-voting-what-is-2-3-s-of-a-majority
Ugh.
-- S.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Sanford Whiteman
swhitemanlistens-softw...@cypressintegrated.com wrote:
Ah, this is why one should trust a coder over a butler:
http://www.ask.com/answers/112530521/5-people-are-voting-what-is-2-3-s-of-a-majority
Ugh.
-- S.
--
PHP Internals - PHP
No offense intended, but if you've got so many OOP objects flying
around that they are sucking down that much memory...
You probably need to refactor your code and just don't do that
Just my opinion.
--
brain cancer update:
http://richardlynch.blogspot.com/search/label/brain%20tumor
Donate:
Alright, thanks for the reply!
I'll try to have a look at the code and give it a try next weekend.
Nuno
-Original Message-
From: zoe slattery
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Parallel run-tests
On 21/05/2012 06:45, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi Zoe,
Thanks for
31 matches
Mail list logo
