Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 RecursiveDirectoryIterator

2013-08-20 Thread Laruence
Hey: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Martin Keckeis wrote: > Hello together, > > an incompatible change was made to the 5.4 series without any notice. > > It's related to RecursiveDirectoryIterator > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64228 > > See the source here: > https://github.com/php/php-src/

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Importing namespaced functions

2013-08-20 Thread Igor Wiedler
Hi Stas, Thanks for the notes. I will address these issues, hopefully during the next few days. Good job spotting them! Regards, Igor On Aug 19, 2013, at 3:32 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use_function >> Patch: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/388 >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Which OSs and SAPI should PHP 5.6 support?

2013-08-20 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Terry Ellison in php.internals (Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:17:38 +0100): >However, I don't think that this is appreciated in the wider PHP >community (for example I can't recall it ever being discussed or >emphasised on StackOverflow). In the Windows world performance certainly was a topic. I suspect P

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Strict session: ext/session/mod_files.c ext/session/mod_files.h ext/session/mod_mm.c ext/session/php_session.h ext/session/session.c ext/session/tests/003.phpt

2013-08-20 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > I didn't merge the change to 5.5.3 branch. It might be better > cherry pick change to 5.5.3 branch. It doesn't look like something critical, so I don't think there's a need to put it into 5.5.3. It will be picked as a part of scheduled release. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect Su

Re: [PHP-DEV] Which OSs and SAPI should PHP 5.6 support?

2013-08-20 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 17:17 +0100, Terry Ellison wrote: > On 20/08/13 16:50, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > > > Terry Ellison wrote: > > > PHP (unlike some language alternatives) seems to be doing little to > > > improve general performance, and the discussions related to > > > performance on this DL

Re: [PHP-DEV] Which OSs and SAPI should PHP 5.6 support?

2013-08-20 Thread Terry Ellison
On 20/08/13 16:50, Johannes Schlüter wrote: Terry Ellison wrote: PHP (unlike some language alternatives) seems to be doing little to improve general performance, and the discussions related to performance on this DL are almost non-existent. Looking at any benchmark from 5.2 to 5.3 to 5.4 and 5

Re: [PHP-DEV] Which OSs and SAPI should PHP 5.6 support?

2013-08-20 Thread Johannes Schlüter
Hi, I'll get back on the other things later, but a short comment (flaming) on this: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 16:34 +0100, Terry Ellison wrote: > > PHP (unlike some language alternatives) seems to be doing little to > improve general performance, and the discussions related to > performance on this

Re: [PHP-DEV] Which OSs and SAPI should PHP 5.6 support?

2013-08-20 Thread Terry Ellison
Johannes, Thanks, but I'll make some responses On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 17:05 +0100, Terry Ellison wrote: By way of a background. I've been doing a review of the exting code base looking at how to establishing a roadmap extend OPcache functionality across all supported OSes and SAPIs. And this ra

[PHP-DEV] 5.4 RecursiveDirectoryIterator

2013-08-20 Thread Martin Keckeis
Hello together, an incompatible change was made to the 5.4 series without any notice. It's related to RecursiveDirectoryIterator https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64228 See the source here: https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/PHP-5.4/ext/spl/spl_directory.c#L1452 I've never used the "SKIP_DOTS"

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Strict session: ext/session/mod_files.c ext/session/mod_files.h ext/session/mod_mm.c ext/session/php_session.h ext/session/session.c ext/session/tests/003.phpt

2013-08-20 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
Hi Stas, On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> > This is because I didn't edit these files. >> > >> > Stas, are you going to add explanations and doc? Or shall I? >> >> If you could fix it it'd be great. >> > > Ok. I'll