On 30/07/14 06:48, Andrea Faulds wrote:
That would make sense, but doesn't solve all edge cases as your maximum array
index is still more than 2 times the largest positive integer on 32-bit.
Are we still looking at a situation where how a program performs is
platform specific? An array index of
On 20 July 2014 16:44, Peter Cowburn petercowb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2014 07:24, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:34 PM, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
Sounds very good and 0.8% overhead is fine. Can we work on getting this
integrated into a
On 30 Jul 2014, at 07:50, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com wrote:
That would make sense, but doesn't solve all edge cases as your maximum array
index is still more than 2 times the largest positive integer on 32-bit.
Is that by design, a bug or something else entirely? Could you
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 14:38, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
My sincerest apologies about all the mess earlier and the delay. Both me
and Zeev are happy enough with the RFC, so the voting for this RFC has
started (again). It
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
On 28/07/2014 09:46, Michael Wallner wrote:
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=67064patch=bug67064-BCrevision=1402667581
+1 on Matteo's patch. Rather a single fix than a couple.
IIRC, we also
Am 28.7.2014 um 15:03 schrieb Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com:
Hi everyone,
On 28/07/2014 09:46, Michael Wallner wrote:
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=67064patch=bug67064-BCrevision=1402667581
+1 on Matteo's patch. Rather a single fix than a couple.
IIRC, we also have to think
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote (on 28/07/2014):
- Consistent naming
- Consistent parameter order
- Graceful function/class/interface deprecation
(We know what we should do for these, right?)
I'm not sure if this was meant sincerely, or slightly tongue-in-cheek,
but no, we definitely don't. It comes
Hi,
any news on this, any big problems that delay RC3? Or will it be
skipped? Some info would be nice.
Thanks!
Michael
Am 04.07.2014 um 00:52 schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
Hi,
The second Release Candidate for 5.6.0 was just released and can be
downloaded from:
http://qa.php.net/
The
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Michael Kliewe i...@phpgangsta.de wrote:
Hi,
any news on this, any big problems that delay RC3? Or will it be skipped?
Some info would be nice.
Thanks!
Michael
Hi,
RC3 was just tagged, and expected to be released on thursday.
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l -
Hi Bob,
On 30/07/2014 14:33, Bob Weinand wrote:
Is this a problem if the interface internally doesn't expect a parameter?
You're free to expect the parameter or not, where's the issue?
We allow implementations to accept more optional parameters than the
interface specifies, but not less.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 30/07/2014 14:33, Bob Weinand wrote:
Is this a problem if the interface internally doesn't expect a parameter?
You're free to expect the parameter or not, where's the issue?
We allow implementations to
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 30/07/2014 14:33, Bob Weinand wrote:
Is this a problem if the interface internally doesn't expect a
parameter?
You're free to
Good stuff everyone. Glad the vote went through.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 14:38, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
My sincerest apologies about all the mess
Am 30.7.2014 um 17:08 schrieb Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 30/07/2014 14:33, Bob Weinand wrote:
Is this a problem if the interface
-1 explanation: I don't think %% is clear enough, the only sensible
syntax choice (//) is unavailable to us, and I think the utility of
having it baked into the language as an operator is pretty minimal
regardless (I coded a lot of Python for scientific research in a
previous job, and I don't
On 30 Jul 2014, at 18:51, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
-1 explanation: I don't think %% is clear enough
% returns the 2nd part of the integer division, %% returns the 1st. Surely that
makes sense?
I think the utility of
having it baked into the language as an operator is pretty
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 30 Jul 2014, at 18:51, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
-1 explanation: I don't think %% is clear enough
% returns the 2nd part of the integer division, %% returns the 1st. Surely
that makes sense?
That makes sense in
On 30 Jul 2014, at 18:57, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 30 Jul 2014, at 18:51, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
-1 explanation: I don't think %% is clear enough
% returns the 2nd part of the integer division, %%
On 30 July 2014 19:57, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 30 Jul 2014, at 18:51, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
-1 explanation: I don't think %% is clear enough
% returns the 2nd part of the integer division, %%
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2014 19:57, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 30 Jul 2014, at 18:51, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
-1 explanation: I don't
Hi Ferenc,
is there any reason why seemingly you never read my original mail
about those branches beeing off-limit and those commit gonna be reverted?
http://news.php.net/php.cvs/79411
That's my fault due to how my email filters was configured.
Just a suggestion to make the collaboration
Hi,
Hi!
All right, looks like it is my fault not making the reply sounds
critical enough. It pretty much make all third party php-litespeed rpms
useless, only causes trouble and confusion for LiteSpeed users.
I'm not sure what changed with the last php release - the old code was
there for a
Contributing to the PHP language specification
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
They don’t necessarily need to be symbols. Pascal, for example, uses ‘/' for
floating-point division, ‘div' for integer division, ‘mod' for modulus, and
‘rem' for remainder. For example:
20 / 8 = 2.5
20 mod 8 = 4
In PHP, we already have precedence for non-symbol in operators like ‘and',
‘or',
24 matches
Mail list logo
