On 12 Aug 2014, at 01:15, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
>
> On 12 Aug, 2014, at 5:03 am, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11 Aug 2014, at 22:00, Hannes Magnusson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it would be fantastic if this would be included in 5.6.
>>
>> Too late for 5.6, but 5.7 perhaps (can we please
On 12 Aug, 2014, at 5:03 am, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 22:00, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
>> I think it would be fantastic if this would be included in 5.6.
>
> Too late for 5.6, but 5.7 perhaps (can we please have this? 7 will break BC
> and I’d like to get some stuff in ne
On Aug 10, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the slow response, I’ve been on holiday.
No problem!
> On 8 Aug 2014, at 01:32, Josh Watzman wrote:
>
>> The RFC goes a long way to fixing this, but one important place it misses is
>> with function references to private
it's ambiguous with regular object creation.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Michael Wallner wrote:
> How about 'new Function()'?
>
> Might be a WTF that it creates an instance of Closure, though.
> On 11 Aug 2014 22:32, "Dmitry Stogov" wrote:
>
>> We didn't keep pointers t
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 22:00, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> I think it would be fantastic if this would be included in 5.6.
>>
> Too late for 5.6, but 5.7 perhaps (can we please have this? 7 will break BC
> and I’d like to get some stuff in next y
On 11 Aug 2014, at 22:00, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> I think it would be fantastic if this would be included in 5.6.
Too late for 5.6, but 5.7 perhaps (can we please have this? 7 will break BC and
I’d like to get some stuff in next year, not in 2 years).
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/
--
I think it would be fantastic if this would be included in 5.6.
-Hannes
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php-array-api
>
>
> Time to commit?
>
> -Hannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Deve
How about 'new Function()'?
Might be a WTF that it creates an instance of Closure, though.
On 11 Aug 2014 22:32, "Dmitry Stogov" wrote:
> We didn't keep pointers to functions in opcodes (however it possible in
> some cases).
> Instead we use cache_slots in op_array->run_time_cache array to keep
We didn't keep pointers to functions in opcodes (however it possible in
some cases).
Instead we use cache_slots in op_array->run_time_cache array to keep
pointers to classes and functions.
Anyway, it must be quite easy to extend the patch.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Andre
On 11 Aug 2014, at 20:07, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
> may be:
>
> $a = function strlen;
>
> or
>
> $a = function(stren);
>
> but these are not excellent as well :(
I wanted to do the first, but it caused a shift/reduce conflict in the parser
due to ambiguity with function () {}. The latter h
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 08:36, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > Could you measure the performance impact of function referencing.
> >
> > > $func = "strlen";
> > for ($i = 0; $i < 1; $i++) {
> > $func("hello");
> > }
> >
On 11 Aug 2014, at 08:36, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Could you measure the performance impact of function referencing.
>
> $func = "strlen";
> for ($i = 0; $i < 1; $i++) {
> $func("hello");
> }
> ?>
>
> vs
>
> $func = &strlen;
> for ($i = 0; $i < 1; $i++) {
> $fu
On 11 August 2014 18:44, Chris Wright wrote:
> I don't think that it even makes sense to have this as a possibility
> for internal classes.
>
Even leaving everything else outside, I think internal classes should
become less magic and more transparent over time.
The current "fixing" of internal c
On 11 August 2014 17:09, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Tom Oram wrote:
>>
>>> I've just been looking back at the history of this previous conversation...
>>>
>>> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=132673741606531
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Aaron Lewis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand how php-fpm works, aka how does nginx
> "forward" the request to it.
>
> Now I want an example program that do it or the document that explains it.
> Anyone know where to get those?
Hey,
This is all about the F
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Tom Oram wrote:
>
>> I've just been looking back at the history of this previous conversation...
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=132673741606531&w=2
>>
>> as a mockist tester I'd really REALLY like
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Pascal Chevrel
wrote:
> Le 11/08/2014 16:10, Laruence a écrit :
>
> Hey:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Pascal Chevrel
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 01/08/2014 13:58, Pascal Chevrel a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi
Another bug I found: https://bugs.php.net/b
Le 11/08/2014 16:10, Laruence a écrit :
Hey:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Pascal Chevrel wrote:
Le 01/08/2014 13:58, Pascal Chevrel a écrit :
Hi
Another bug I found: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67735
When running "composer update" on a project I participate in
(https://github.co
Hey:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Pascal Chevrel wrote:
> Le 01/08/2014 13:58, Pascal Chevrel a écrit :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Another bug I found: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67735
>>
>> When running "composer update" on a project I participate in
>> (https://github.com/framasoft/framadate), P
Le 01/08/2014 13:58, Pascal Chevrel a écrit :
Hi
Another bug I found: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67735
When running "composer update" on a project I participate in
(https://github.com/framasoft/framadate), PHPNG crashes.
Regards
Pascal
Regarding this bug, can somebody answer my questio
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Andrea Faulds
> Subject: Re: PHP RFC: Scalar type-hinting with cast
> Date: 11 August 2014 13:46:05 BST
> To: Benjamin Morel
>
>
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 13:41, Benjamin Morel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m a strong supporter of this feature request, so first of al
On 11 Aug 2014, at 12:08, Rowan Collins wrote:
> I understand that &$foo->method won't work, but that's what I mean by
> pre-supposing the proposed syntax.
>
> If you had a different syntax, such as £function (I know it's not a sensible
> choice, but it's an example of something with no confl
Andrea Faulds wrote (on 10/08/2014):
On 10 Aug 2014, at 22:00, Rowan Collins wrote:
You're rather pre-supposing the proposed syntax there, and letting it lead the
semantics rather than vice versa. The point is it would be useful to allow
creation of a pre-bound closure based on an existing m
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Tom Oram wrote:
> I've just been looking back at the history of this previous conversation...
>
> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=132673741606531&w=2
>
> as a mockist tester I'd really REALLY like to see this be possible but I
> can see the problem with the or
On 11 August 2014 11:30, Chris Wright wrote:
> Hi Tom
>
> On 9 August 2014 11:35, Tom Oram wrote:
>> I've just been looking back at the history of this previous conversation...
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=132673741606531&w=2
>>
>> as a mockist tester I'd really REALLY like to see th
Hi Tom,
On 9 August 2014 12:35, Tom Oram wrote:
> Thoughts?
>
Possible? Probably, yes.
I'd actually argue that it may not be a good solution: it seems to me that
if you have to resort to this kind of mocking, then someone type-hinted
against a concrete implementation, which is a smell. Shouldn
Hi Tom
On 9 August 2014 11:35, Tom Oram wrote:
> I've just been looking back at the history of this previous conversation...
>
> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=132673741606531&w=2
>
> as a mockist tester I'd really REALLY like to see this be possible but I
> can see the problem with the orig
Hi Andrea,
Could you measure the performance impact of function referencing.
vs
I don't like the "&" syntax a lot, but I understand that it's a compromise
between readability and implementation complication.
The patch probably misses support for "&self::foo", "&parent::foo",
"&static::foo".
28 matches
Mail list logo
