Hi!
> I like the label idea, it will help having a nice overall look on the PRs.
>
> When I myself find some time, I mainly browse through bugs.php.net and
> fix things and close issues.
As an experiment, I went and added a bunch of labels to github:
RFC - for RFC PRs
bugfix - for fixes associat
Hi!
>> we only need do it in master process, and mark as interned(with hash
>> precalculated), no write will be happened, so thanks to COW on fork, we
>> won't need lots of extra memory.
>>
>
> It's not true for Windows.
> On Linux we would copy arg_info from shared read-only segment into process
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 18, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>
>> Hey:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Please
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 18, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>> Hey:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Please review the patch
>> > https://gist.github.com/dstogo
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> Hey:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please review the patch
> https://gist.github.com/dstogov/47a39aff37f0a6441ea0
>
> I am not sure, why can't we build a zend_string arg->name from char *
> whi
Hey:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the patch https://gist.github.com/dstogov/47a39aff37f0a6441ea0
I am not sure, why can't we build a zend_string arg->name from char *
while doing register internal functions?
then we can have the same zend_arg_
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 15/11/2014 11:11, Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
>
> > Yeah, the test coverage of fpm is lacking, and while this PR
> > contained a test for testing the happy path (that you can listen on
> > ipv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 15/11/2014 11:11, Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
> Yeah, the test coverage of fpm is lacking, and while this PR
> contained a test for testing the happy path (that you can listen on
> ipv6) but there were no tests which could have helped us to spot
> the
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2014 4:26 PM, "Matteo Beccati" wrote:
> >
> > On 15/11/2014 11:11, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > > 2014.11.15. 8:28 ezt írta ("Remi Collet"
> > > ):
> > >>
> > > FPM state in 5.5.19 / 5.6.3 is quite bad :(
> >
> > Maybe I'm saying so
On Nov 17, 2014 4:26 PM, "Matteo Beccati" wrote:
>
> On 15/11/2014 11:11, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > 2014.11.15. 8:28 ezt írta ("Remi Collet"
> > ):
> >>
> > FPM state in 5.5.19 / 5.6.3 is quite bad :(
>
> Maybe I'm saying something unpopular, but wouldn't it be better to
> rollback the fpm changes,
On 15/11/2014 11:11, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> 2014.11.15. 8:28 ezt írta ("Remi Collet"
> ):
>>
> FPM state in 5.5.19 / 5.6.3 is quite bad :(
Maybe I'm saying something unpopular, but wouldn't it be better to
rollback the fpm changes, release 5.5.20 and 5.6.4 and keep fpm+ipv6
for master?
Cheers
-
Hi,
Please review the patch https://gist.github.com/dstogov/47a39aff37f0a6441ea0
Thanks. Dmitry.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 15/11/2014 08:27, Remi Collet a écrit :
I have also fixed:
https://bugs.php.net/68428
listen.allowed_clients is IPv4 only
> SO PLEASE, everyone who can test these patches, please test and
> give feedback [1]
Really lot of change
Hi Joe,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Joe Watkins wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 11:16 +0100, Florian Margaine wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > As of today, most of the SAPIs have a lot of code duplication with
> > regards to HTTP headers parsing/handling.
> >
> > I'm about to completely duplicate
14 matches
Mail list logo
