Re: [PHP-DEV] Issues with exceptions and overloading opcodes

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Bob Weinand wrote: > > Am 20.10.2015 um 18:08 schrieb Derick Rethans : > > > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Bob Weinand wrote: > > > >>> Am 20.10.2015 um 17:11 schrieb Xinchen Hui : > >>> > >>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Derick Rethans

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Class Constant Visibility

Hi Sean, internals, While I support this RFC, it seems that the actual implementation is still under discussion. In particular, whether the RFC is going to allow protected constants in an interface is not clear. In the text of the RFC, on one line it says: "This RFC propose PHP support class

[PHP-DEV] Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2015-10-21

Results for project PHP master, build date 2015-10-21 05:12:39+03:00 commit: 387b7c7905490cc66c0f4e1e19727a03ac768801 revision date: 2015-10-20 21:56:20+02:00 environment:Haswell-EP cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2, LLC 45 MB

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Class Constant Visibility

> Who decides if/when we should restart voting? I don't believe we've ever formalized that aspect. I know in the past sometimes RFC authors will notice something wrong and fix it, then restart voting themselves. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit:

[PHP-DEV] LXR targets

Hi, Our LXR is actually wrong. It indexes "php-src" and "PHP_TRUNK", but both point to the same codebase. It also indexes "phpng", which nowadays is useless. Finally , it does NOT index the new PHP-7.0 branch, which to me seems like the biggest problem. Could someone from system@ have a

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Class Constant Visibility

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:54:48PM +, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > Hi Sean, internals, > > While I support this RFC, it seems that the actual implementation is > still under discussion. > > In particular, whether the RFC is going to allow protected constants > in an interface is not clear. > > In the

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Class Constant Visibility

On 21 October 2015 at 16:17, Sean DuBois wrote: > > I will update the RFC. Who decides if/when we should restart voting? "The PHP RFC rules is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules" as there are no set decision makers or rules enforcers. The rules set down for

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Class Constant Visibility

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:31:58PM -0500, Aaron Piotrowski wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > On Oct 21, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Sean DuBois wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:54:48PM +, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > >> Hi Sean, internals, > >> > >> While I support this RFC, it seems that the

Re: [PHP-DEV] SQLite 3.9.X in PHP 7.0.0RC6?

Hi Mark 2015-10-21 12:29 GMT+02:00 Mark Tomlin : > Thanks for the reply, I use the SQLite built into PHP pretty much > exclusively for my projects that that's handy to know when I target for PHP > 7. I think from an RM's point of view, it is a little too soon, plus we are in RC

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Class Constant Visibility

Hi Sean, > On Oct 21, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Sean DuBois wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:54:48PM +, Dan Ackroyd wrote: >> Hi Sean, internals, >> >> While I support this RFC, it seems that the actual implementation is >> still under discussion. >> >> In particular,

RE: [PHP-DEV] LXR targets

Hi Julien, > -Original Message- > From: julienpa...@gmail.com [mailto:julienpa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Julien Pauli > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 7:05 PM > To: PHP Systems ; PHP Internals > Subject: [PHP-DEV] LXR targets > > Hi, > >

Re: [PHP-DEV] async/await - is future reserved words in PHP 7.x?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 21:04 +0300, S.A.N wrote: >> >> When Node.js appear async/await, many developers and projects will >> migrate to a Node.js, if PHP is not implement async APIs. >> >> Hopefully, Dmitry Stogov

Re: [PHP-DEV] async/await - is future reserved words in PHP 7.x?

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Rowan Collins wrote: > On 29 September 2015 16:22:30 BST, Thomas Hruska > wrote: >>On 9/29/2015 6:52 AM, Joe Watkins wrote: >>> We shouldn't reserve words on a whim ... >>> >>> async/await doesn't solve any

Re: [PHP-DEV] Issues with exceptions and overloading opcodes

Hey: On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Bob Weinand wrote: > > > > Am 20.10.2015 um 18:08 schrieb Derick Rethans : > > > > > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Bob Weinand wrote: > > > > > >>> Am 20.10.2015 um 17:11 schrieb

[PHP-DEV] SQLite 3.9.X in PHP 7.0.0RC6?

Will we see the bundled SQLite updated to the 3.9.x released in PHP 7.0.0RC6? -- Thank you for your time, Mark 'Dygear' Tomlin;

Re: [PHP-DEV] SQLite 3.9.X in PHP 7.0.0RC6?

I think it's too soon to update to the 3.9 branch (let it get a little more stable). But if the RM ask for this change I'll be happy to do that. Kaplan On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Mark Tomlin wrote: > Will we see the bundled SQLite updated to the 3.9.x released in

Re: [PHP-DEV] SQLite 3.9.X in PHP 7.0.0RC6?

Thanks for the reply, I use the SQLite built into PHP pretty much exclusively for my projects that that's handy to know when I target for PHP 7. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Lior Kaplan wrote: > I think it's too soon to update to the 3.9 branch (let it get a little > more