[PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Anatol Belski
Hi, After doing the last evaluations in the RMs circle before going for 7.0.0 RTM preparations, we came to the conclusion that the current state does not look reasonable to be packaged as the final release. The RCs before RC6 was looking acceptable, which gave the reason to announce the planned

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Zeev Suraski
> -Original Message- > From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2015 9:49 PM > To: Anatol Belski; internals@lists.php.net > Cc: 'Kalle Sommer Nielsen'; 'Ferenc Kovacs' > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date > > On 11/08/2015 11:15 AM, Anatol Belski

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Void Return Type RFC

2015-11-08 Thread Pascal MARTIN, AFUP
Le 29/10/2015 01:08, Andrea Faulds a écrit : Hi everyone, The vote can be found here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/void_return_type#vote Hi, At AFUP, we would be +1 on this RFC, mostly because adding this kind of static check could help detecting a few mistakes here and there. Thanks for

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Void Return Type RFC

2015-11-08 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hi Pascal, Pascal MARTIN, AFUP wrote: At AFUP, we would be +1 on this RFC, mostly because adding this kind of static check could help detecting a few mistakes here and there. Thanks for your work on this, and welcome back! I'm glad you appreciate it. By the way, I think it's great that you

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 11/08/2015 11:15 AM, Anatol Belski wrote: > Hi, > > After doing the last evaluations in the RMs circle before going for 7.0.0 > RTM preparations, we came to the conclusion that the current state does not > look reasonable to be packaged as the final release. > > The RCs before RC6 was looking

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Christopher Jones
On 9/11/2015 6:15 am, Anatol Belski wrote: Hi, After doing the last evaluations in the RMs circle before going for 7.0.0 RTM preparations, we came to the conclusion that the current state does not look reasonable to be packaged as the final release. The RCs before RC6 was looking acceptable,

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] PhpStorm Open Source Licenses 2015/16

2015-11-08 Thread Christopher Jones
On 9/11/2015 7:01 am, Peter Cowburn wrote: Hi folks, It's that time of year again. If you are using our PhpStorm license, you've probably been prompted about it expiring in December. JetBrains have kindly offered their open source license to us again, and as usual all details are on the

[PHP-DEV] Re: Make sessions use php_random_bytes in 7.1

2015-11-08 Thread Tom Worster
On 10/30/15 3:48 PM, Leigh wrote: I would like to refactor session id generation to use our new php_random_bytes API as the single entropy source for session ids, targeting 7.1 ... I'd like to hear if there are any strong objections to this proposal. Hi Leigh, Again, not an objection but

[PHP-DEV] PhpStorm Open Source Licenses 2015/16

2015-11-08 Thread Peter Cowburn
Hi folks, It's that time of year again. If you are using our PhpStorm license, you've probably been prompted about it expiring in December. JetBrains have kindly offered their open source license to us again, and as usual all details are on the wiki*.

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! > Thus, resuming the pre-release cycle seems in our opinion the right thing to > do ATM. Hence this writing to inform the community about the intention and > to gather the opinions. PHP 7 is still going down the home stretch and is > very close to the finish, the next RC can be well the last.

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] PhpStorm Open Source Licenses 2015/16

2015-11-08 Thread Peter Cowburn
On 8 November 2015 at 20:53, Christopher Jones wrote: > > > On 9/11/2015 7:01 am, Peter Cowburn wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> It's that time of year again. If you are using our PhpStorm license, >> you've >> probably been prompted about it expiring in December.

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Anatol Belski
Hi Stas, > -Original Message- > From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 8:46 PM > To: Anatol Belski ; internals@lists.php.net > Cc: 'Kalle Sommer Nielsen' ; 'Ferenc Kovacs' > Subject: Re:

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Anatol Belski
> -Original Message- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:z...@zend.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 8:57 PM > To: Rasmus Lerdorf ; Anatol Belski > ; internals@lists.php.net > Cc: Kalle Sommer Nielsen ; Ferenc Kovacs

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 11/08/2015 05:16 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: > Exactly, the relevant patches are going into RC7 which is then out on 12th > instead of GA. The next closest release slot were then Nov 26th, either for > GA or for RC8 (but better not try to predict). If it stands good, we might > have no reason to

[PHP-DEV] [RESULT] Void Return Type RFC

2015-11-08 Thread Andrea Faulds
Hi everyone, Voting on the Void Return Type RFC commenced on 2015-10-29 and has ended today, 2015-11-09. By 37 votes in favour to 7 votes against, or 84.1% of votes, the RFC has been accepted for PHP 7.1. You can see who voted which way on the RFC page itself:

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Scott Arciszewski
As much as I had been looking forward to it soon, haste does makes waste. Making a more responsible choice for the users is commendable and outweighs the inconvenience a mere two week delay. +1 from me. Scott Arciszewski Chief Development Officer Paragon Initiative Enterprises

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7 RTM date

2015-11-08 Thread Scott Arciszewski
If nothing else, it will give us an excuse to avoid the Black Friday madness ("Sorry hon, I need to update the server!"). Scott Arciszewski Chief Development Officer Paragon Initiative Enterprises On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 7 : Cannot use stream wrappers during MINIT

2015-11-08 Thread Dmitry Stogov
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:08 AM, François Laupretre wrote: > Hi, > > First, I don't know if this must be considered as a bug, because a lot of > features are not available during MINIT but it seems quite inconsistent. I > precise I'm using the 7.x master branch (I don't know if