On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Davey Shafik wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
> adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/cli_server_http2
I think this is good to have, but I have a few comments:
php -S
On 19/01/16 01:35, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>> $point = new Point(21, 42);
>> list('x' => $x, 'y' => $y) = $point;
>
> You can't do `$x = $point['x'];`, so `list("x" => $x) = $point;` won't
> work either. If you want list() support, implement ArrayAccess.
>
> We could potentially add some extension
2016-01-19 20:03 GMT+02:00 Arvids Godjuks :
> Hello to everyone.
>
> The Draft states:
>
> "This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public
> spaces when an individual is representing the project or its community."
>
> TL;DR: Just no.
>
> Long
Hello to everyone.
The Draft states:
"This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public
spaces when an individual is representing the project or its community."
TL;DR: Just no.
Long version:
What is the definition of "representing project or it's community". If I
make a
Hi again,
I've updated the RFC to v1.1, because I've resolved the open issue of
whether to allow arbitrary expressions for keys. It seems that the risk
of confusion was less than I thought it was, and allowing anything not
only simplifies implementation, but means you can do things like have
On Jan 19, 2016, at 6:21 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Davey Shafik wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
>> adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:
>>
>>
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 6:21 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Davey Shafik wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
>> adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:
>>
>>
Le 13/01/2016 19:48, Thomas Punt a écrit :
Voting has opened for the inclusion of a digit separator in PHP[1]. Voting ends
in
one week's time on January 20th.
Hi,
At AFUP, we would be on the -1 side (by a huge margin).
The "good" thing would be code that's a bit more readable, yes.
But it
On 19 January 2016 at 02:20, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> After considering how to implement this at the opcode level, I've decided
> again that it's not worth it. Mixing keyed and unkeyed elements is not only
> an implementation nuisance (it's not necessarily hard, but it makes things
>
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-01-19 06:30:40+02:00
commit: 8e60e0c
previous commit:3a8c4a0
revision date: 2016-01-18 20:52:17+01:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
Lester Caine wrote on 19/01/2016 11:49:
If we ever add object literals, then
>we could do object destructuring with a symmetrical syntax.
Andrea, please bare with me as I'm trying to work out just what some of
those long words actually mean.
I think what Andrea's getting at is being able to
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Stig Bakken
> wrote:
> > On Jan 17, 2016 05:23, "Sara Golemon" wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay, i've got a starting point up at
> >>
12 matches
Mail list logo