Hi Björn and David,
As the author of that proposal, I'd say it's more of a “was”. It was a
huge project and I gave up on it. It could be attempted again, but I
don't expect PHP 8 to be appearing very soon (and this is a change that
would have to be in a major version), and I'm not sure if
Firstly, thanks for your interest.
My answers are inline.
2016-09-01 23:48 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Rochette :
>
>
> On 09/01/2016 09:12 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> > On 9/1/2016 3:49 PM, Silvio Marijić wrote:
> >> Hi Andre,
> >>
> >> Here is RFC
Hi Lars,
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Lars Strojny wrote:
>> On 31 Aug 2016, at 21:45, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> [...]
>> Thank you for voting!
>> The RFC is declined 1 vs 13
>> A bit surprised this result.
>>
>> I requested the reason of objection, but many
On 09/01/2016 09:12 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 9/1/2016 3:49 PM, Silvio Marijić wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> Here is RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/immutability and you have link to
>> implementation github. Any suggestions and feedback are more then welcome.
>>
>> Best,
>> Silvio
>>
> Hi Silvio,
>
Hi all,
Frustrated by typo in ini_set/ini_get, so I wrote patch.
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2111
Any comments?
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 9/1/2016 8:02 PM, Davey Shafik wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > A while back I brought a small RFC to internals, that proposed a set of
> > constants that were specifically for alternative implementations to
> > identify
On 9/1/2016 3:49 PM, Silvio Marijić wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Here is RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/immutability and you have link to
> implementation github. Any suggestions and feedback are more then welcome.
>
> Best,
> Silvio
>
Hi Silvio,
very nice work you guys did here! :)
Abstract classes
On 9/1/2016 8:02 PM, Davey Shafik wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> A while back I brought a small RFC to internals, that proposed a set of
> constants that were specifically for alternative implementations to
> identify themselves as such if they want to conform to the spec.
>
>
Hey all,
A while back I brought a small RFC to internals, that proposed a set of
constants that were specifically for alternative implementations to
identify themselves as such if they want to conform to the spec.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php_engine_constant
There were some folks who didn't
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:03 AM Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I would propose to cancel voting and restart it when the good
> implementation is found.
>
> Otherwise, people may rise their hands for something that can't be
> implemented in good enough way.
>
> Thanks.
Hi,
The first release candidate for PHP 7.1.0, RC1 was just released and can be
downloaded from:
https://downloads.php.net/~davey/
The Windows binaries are available at
http://windows.php.net/qa/
For the list of bug fixes and other changes that you can target in your
testing, please
Is planned async/await and native event-loop (maybe libuv)?
Thank.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Andre,
Here is RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/immutability and you have link to
implementation github. Any suggestions and feedback are more then welcome.
Best,
Silvio
2016-09-01 15:43 GMT+02:00 André Rømcke :
>
>
> > On Aug 8, 2016, at 19:19 , Michał Brzuchalski
On Sep 1, 2016 2:04 PM, "Dmitry Stogov" wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
> I would propose to cancel voting and restart it when the good
implementation is found.
>
> Otherwise, people may rise their hands for something that can't be
implemented in good enough way.
There is no need to
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-09-01 06:24:38+03:00
commit: a3c1626
previous commit:abe3ce5
revision date: 2016-09-01 10:42:03+09:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
On 01/09/2016 13:12, Marco Pivetta wrote:
Yeah, and I would question:
1. why are you editing with a plaintext editor and searching stuff like
that? Are you in a super-hurry? Seems like a 0.001% scenario
2. why do you need to search for functions in a class? Just what kind of
monstrous
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Robert Williams
wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 11:49, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>
> I remember an argument that "function" is useful to "grep functions".
> This is true, but we have tokenizer and tokenizer does better job.
Hey:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi @internals,
>
> I'm glad to say that we have started a new JIT for PHP project and hope to
> deliver some useful results for the next PHP version (probably 8.0).
> We are very early in the process and for now there
Hi Yasuo,
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 21:45, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
[...]
> Thank you for voting!
> The RFC is declined 1 vs 13
> A bit surprised this result.
>
> I requested the reason of objection, but many of them does not disclose why.
[...]
> lstrojny (lstrojny)
[...]
sorry for
Hi @internals,
I'm glad to say that we have started a new JIT for PHP project and hope to
deliver some useful results for the next PHP version (probably 8.0).
We are very early in the process and for now there isn't any real performance
improvement yet. So far we spent just 2 weeks mainly
Hi,
PHP 7.0.11 RC1 was just released and can be downloaded from:
https://downloads.php.net/~ab/
The Windows binaries are available at
http://windows.php.net/qa/
This release contains a number of bugfixes.
For the list of bugfixes that you can target in your testing, please refer
to
Hi David,
I would propose to cancel voting and restart it when the good implementation is
found.
Otherwise, people may rise their hands for something that can't be implemented
in good enough way.
Thanks. Dmitry.
From: David Walker
Sent:
22 matches
Mail list logo