Hi!
Looks like commit eef85229d0fe9f69d325aa0231e592f35c468afb broke
oss-fuzz builds:
https://oss-fuzz-build-logs.storage.googleapis.com/log-66ab74a7-4ece-4e14-b21b-f60527dd7244.txt
The error message is:
Step #4: /usr/bin/ld: dynamic STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol `php_stripslashes'
with pointer equality
> On 9 Sep 2019, at 02:11, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> I did not realize you were proposing a different solution, too. Sorry I
> missed that.
>
I didn’t mean in terms of an actual proposal, more so identifying what I think
would be more intuitive (mostly based on what others have
Hi Stephen,
Thanks again.
> So let me start out by clarifying that what *I* was suggesting with unions is
> quite a different concept than you’re talking about.
I did not realize you were proposing a different solution, too. Sorry I missed
that.
> yes, I’m aware there’s potential ambiguous
> On 9 Sep 2019, at 00:44, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you for the follow up.
>
> I am heading out for a week-long conference later today and not sure if I
> will have time to participate on the list for a while so I wanted to get a
> quick reply to you before I leave.
>
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for the follow up.
I am heading out for a week-long conference later today and not sure if I will
have time to participate on the list for a while so I wanted to get a quick
reply to you before I leave.
> In terms of how I would see it working -
In hindsight I should
Hello,
I didn't get any response to my email from June 17th, yet I think this is
pretty critical, see below.
I did not manage to make preloading with Symfony yet, see
https://bugs.php.net/78512 also?
Thanks for considering, the behavior is unexpected to me, as it deviates
from common behavior.
I
> On 6 Sep 2019, at 17:21, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you again for the reply.
>
>> and wasn’t really built for that purpose AFAIK, but in ‘weak’ mode (i.e. no
>> strict_types=1) it would be invoked if the destination type specified a
>> string. I was implying that this
On 8 September 2019 11:42:07 BST, Brent wrote:
> - We could add community guidelines, clearly stating that RFC comments
>should stay on topic
> - People could be appointed to moderate the comments, allowing
>contributors to focus on the code instead of community management
> - Conversations on
Happy to read your thoughts on this Nikita, I think you've drawn some good
conclusions.
If I may add a thought or two:
I wouldn't make any final decisions based on one experiment, especially a big
RFC as this one. I think the GitHub discussion got extra attention because it
was the first one,
