Hi,
On 2020-03-26 14:30, Nikita Popov wrote:
I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
This is based on one off the suggestions made in
https://externals.io/message/109220, and some existing discussion on the
topic can be
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:07 PM Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
> It seems to me it's pretty obvious it's not about the syntax anyway -
> nothing would please the people who find COPA useless and any syntax
> would be great for people who find it useful!
> Anything in between just feels like discussing
Hi Andrea,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:35 AM Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Maybe it would be good to allow multiple-choice voting on why the RFC
> was not voted for, and also to provide an option in the syntax vote for
> not liking any of the syntax options, rather than just “Irrelevant”.
Right.
I
Hi Jakob,
Jakob Givoni wrote:
Heads up!
I've moved the RFC to the voting phase:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/compact-object-property-assignment
Voting is open until the end of Monday, April 13 (your time zone :-).
Good night,
Jakob
Maybe it would be good to allow multiple-choice voting on
On 01/04/2020 12:19, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
We can't really do that since break already accepts an integer telling
it how many enclosing structures it should jump out of.
Sure, but we could use "return", or some other keyword. My point was
that the syntax could look a lot closer to a switch
Hi Rowan
I agree that the structure of the RFC is sub optimal. Honestly, I've
rewritten and moved things at least 5 times and it's still not good.
I'll see how I can improve it.
> so we could maybe combine them with the break keyword:
>
> $y = switch ($x) {
> case 0:
> break 'Foo';
On 01/04/2020 09:56, Rowan Tommins wrote:
If the intention is to make this feel like an expression version of the switch
statement, then making it look more similar would make sense.
To expand on this a bit, if the aim is "a switch statement, but usable
as an expression", then it would make
On 31 March 2020 19:50:59 BST, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
>There's been a fundamental disagreement on what the switch expression
>should actually be. Due to the conflicting feedback I no longer know
>how to proceed.
I think this confusion is there in your proposal, not just in people's
responses to
Hi internals
After Levis email yesterday we discussed his suggestions in private. I
did some investigation and did find a way to reuse the current switch
syntax. The main problem of the ambiguity was the empty switch
statement vs expression:
```
// Could be a switch expression or a switch
Hi Allen,
+1 from me. If you need some help with the implementation, pls let me know.
Cheers
On 28/03/2020 20:02, AllenJB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I present for discussion an RFC to change the default PDO error mode:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pdo_default_errmode
>
> Previous discussion:
10 matches
Mail list logo
