> On May 29, 2020, at 18:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 30.05.20 um 00:58 schrieb Ben Ramsey:
>>> On May 29, 2020, at 17:34, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:07 AM Benas IML
>>> wrote:
Here's a quote from Ben Ramsey that basically sums up the problem:
> Am 29.05.2020 um 21:02 schrieb Larry Garfield :
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020, at 9:32 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:51 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi internals,
>>>
>>> I've recently started a thread on resurrecting the named arguments
>>> proposal
> On May 29, 2020, at 17:34, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:07 AM Benas IML wrote:
>>
>> Here's a quote from Ben Ramsey that basically sums up the problem:
>>
>>> This appears to be happening due to DMARC rules on the domains of the
>>> senders.
>>> I had the same thing
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:07 AM Benas IML wrote:
>
> Here's a quote from Ben Ramsey that basically sums up the problem:
>
> > This appears to be happening due to DMARC rules on the domains of the
> > senders.
> > I had the same thing happen to my emails, so I had to relax my DMARC rules.
> >
Hey,
Here's a quote from Ben Ramsey that basically sums up the problem:
> This appears to be happening due to DMARC rules on the domains of the
senders.
> I had the same thing happen to my emails, so I had to relax my DMARC
rules. If
> your rules are set too strict, servers see the From address
Hi internals,
Sorry for the off-topic, but I need to ask you on this list, how do you
guys avoid having your emails ultimately ending up in the spam folders of
the mailing list recipients?
I had troubles in the past so now I'm using this new gmail account as
someone suggested, hoping you will at
On Fri, May 29, 2020, at 9:32 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:51 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I've recently started a thread on resurrecting the named arguments
> > proposal (https://externals.io/message/109549), as this has come up
> > tangentially in
Hi, I'd like to present a new RFC for your consideration:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/error_backtraces
In a nutshell, I'm proposing to give errors equal rights with exceptions
and provide backtraces for them, too.
--
Best regards,
Max Semenik
Hello, internals!
I have opened the voting for
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/magic-methods-signature.
The voting period ends on 2020-06-19 at 18h (CEST).
Thanks,
-- Gabriel Caruso
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:51 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I've recently started a thread on resurrecting the named arguments
> proposal (https://externals.io/message/109549), as this has come up
> tangentially in some recent discussions around attributes and around object
>
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:18 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> This was previously discussed in https://externals.io/message/108841, but
> I figured it would make sense to create an RFC for this change:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/stable_sorting
>
> As before, the implementation approach
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:17 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion.
> Voting will close 2020-05-29.
>
The constructor property promotion has been accepted with 46 votes in favor
and 10 against.
Regards,
Nikita
On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 19:53, Ben Ramsey wrote:
>
> In light of recent discussions on attribute naming schemes, I’m
> concerned that future RFC discussions will be riddled with noisy
> back-and-forth messages concerning what and how to name things. I’m not
> passing any judgement on these types
13 matches
Mail list logo
