Thanks, my browser was automatically populating the wrong email, I've now
registered. Apparently I need to request karma now? Username dwgebler.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 12:19 AM Christoph M. Becker
wrote:
> On 06.06.2020 at 00:00, David Gebler wrote:
>
> > As a side-note, I am unable to register
On 06.06.2020 at 00:00, David Gebler wrote:
> As a side-note, I am unable to register a wiki.php.net account to raise
> this RFC, I get a very unhelpful error message which just says "That wasn't
> the answer we were expecting" when I submit my details. Anyone have any
> idea what that is?
I
Hi internals
> I'd like to announce the match expression v2 RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/match_expression_v2
Small reminder: Two weeks have passed since I announced the match v2
RFC with little new discussion. I'll leave it open for another two
weeks and put it to a vote then if there are no
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:58 AM guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Overall, all these amendments are good in my opinion, but I'd like to
> challenge a few things:
>
> 1- On item 3, the acceptable targets would be: class, function,
> method, property,
As a side-note, I am unable to register a wiki.php.net account to raise
this RFC, I get a very unhelpful error message which just says "That wasn't
the answer we were expecting" when I submit my details. Anyone have any
idea what that is?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:19 PM David Gebler wrote:
>
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:42 PM Max Semenik wrote:
> I was thinking about making some improvements to our venerable test runner,
> however I wasn't feeling confident about improving the present code base.
> Instead, I decided to attempt to refactor it.
>
> Here's my work in progress:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 10:42 AM Max Semenik wrote:
> I was thinking about making some improvements to our venerable test runner,
> however I wasn't feeling confident about improving the present code base.
> Instead, I decided to attempt to refactor it.
>
> This is a perennial topic and I don't
I was thinking about making some improvements to our venerable test runner,
however I wasn't feeling confident about improving the present code base.
Instead, I decided to attempt to refactor it.
Here's my work in progress: https://github.com/MaxSem/run-tests
It requires Composer only for
RFC karma granted.
Best of luck with the RFC. :)
On 05.06.2020 at 16:24, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 05.06.2020 at 15:55, Gert de Pagter wrote:
>
>> Hey Internals,
>>
>> I’d like RFC karma in order to write an RFC on intersection types.
>>
>> Could someone give me the need permissions?
>>
On 05.06.2020 at 15:55, Gert de Pagter wrote:
> Hey Internals,
>
> I’d like RFC karma in order to write an RFC on intersection types.
>
> Could someone give me the need permissions?
>
> Thanks in advance!
Have you already registered as new Wiki user[1]? If so, what's your
user name?
[1]
Hey Internals,
I’d like RFC karma in order to write an RFC on intersection types.
Could someone give me the need permissions?
Thanks in advance!
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:45 PM Christian Schneider
wrote:
> Am 05.05.2020 um 15:51 schrieb Nikita Popov :
> > \I've now updated the old proposal on this topic, and moved it back under
> > discussion: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params
>
> First of all I really like this approach to Named
Am 05.05.2020 um 15:51 schrieb Nikita Popov :
> \I've now updated the old proposal on this topic, and moved it back under
> discussion: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params
First of all I really like this approach to Named Parameters: It seems to fit
well with the rest of PHP.
Note: I'm using
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:14 AM Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
>
> It's that time of year again. Feature freeze is looming, so it's time to
>> talk about deprecations!
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_0
>>
>
> Thanks for the RFC.
> Would it make sense for you to postpone this for 8.1?
>
> It's that time of year again. Feature freeze is looming, so it's time to
> talk about deprecations!
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_0
>
Thanks for the RFC.
Would it make sense for you to postpone this for 8.1?
I'm talking with my experience on Symfony here: we decided to give
Hi internals,
It's that time of year again. Feature freeze is looming, so it's time to
talk about deprecations!
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_0
The procedure is as usual. There are multiple deprecations part of the RFC,
but they will be voted separately.
If you would like to add
16 matches
Mail list logo
