On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:36 PM Gabriel Caruso
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 19:16, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a heads up that I would like to drop support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 in PHP
> > 8.0 as it doesn't seem to be supported by any major distro (think that RHEL
> > switched to
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 19:16, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a heads up that I would like to drop support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 in PHP
> 8.0 as it doesn't seem to be supported by any major distro (think that RHEL
> switched to 1.0.2 in 7.4 and not aware about another distro that would
> still su
Hi,
Just a heads up that I would like to drop support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 in PHP
8.0 as it doesn't seem to be supported by any major distro (think that RHEL
switched to 1.0.2 in 7.4 and not aware about another distro that would
still support 1.0.1).
Please shout if you have any concerns.
Cheers
J
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:23 PM Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> > > Derick and Benjamin (and Sara), are these requests reasonable? If
> > > the RFC follows the discussion period rule and contains all the
> > > relevant information, I will be much more confide
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Sara Golemon wrote:
> Derick was trying to be good and meet my beta3 deadline.
And I even got that date wrong by a week. Oops.
> Fortunately, I gave him that deadline (while thinking RC1) knowing
> some kind of bullshit like this would come up and LO AND BEHOLD here
> we a
Hey internals,
I've submitted https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/5935 as a way to expose
an underlying PDO driver's check_liveness function to userland scripts.
Often advice given on the internet is to issue a no-op statement (e.g.
SELECT 1 FROM dual), but this adds potentially unnecessary overhe
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 9:48 AM Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 7:22 AM Theodore Brown wrote:
> > I was very surprised that it went to vote less than six days after
> > the discussion period started, right after the weekend no less,
> > before I had a chance to submit my patch to i
Hi internals
I've been thinking about ways to improve string interpolation. String
interpolation in PHP is currently pretty limited to say the least.
What's worse is we have several ways to do the same thing and a few of
them being quite inconsistent and confusing.
We have these syntaxes:
1. Dir
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 9:16 AM Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:22 PM Theodore Brown wrote:
> > There's certainly been a lot of discussion in general about
> > attributes. However, there was not a reasonable opportunity to either
> > discuss the specific arguments made in thi
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 7:22 AM Theodore Brown
wrote:
> I was very surprised that it went to vote less than six days after
> the discussion period started, right after the weekend no less,
> before I had a chance to submit my patch to include the @: syntax.
>
>
Yes. Derick fucked up the *letter*
On 8/14/2020 09:34, Paul M. Jones wrote:
(That presumes the need for the RFC even exists, which I submit it does not --
but that's a separate topic.)
The most frustrating part of this entire bike shed and devolution into
finger pointing of rule breaking could have all been avoided if
Inte
> On Aug 14, 2020, at 09:16, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>
> What do you mean by defer exactly? Stop voting or reset the vote? We were
> thinking of extending the vote until September 1st.
For my part, "extending a vote that started too early to let it run longer" is
not a reasonable remedy. The
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:22 PM Theodore Brown
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 8:41 PM Levi Morrison
> wrote:
>
> > > So, a week+ early, then? Surely that means the current vote null
> > > and void, to be reset entirely following a proper discussion period
> > > -- one without concurrent voting
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 8:41 PM Levi Morrison
wrote:
> > So, a week+ early, then? Surely that means the current vote null
> > and void, to be reset entirely following a proper discussion period
> > -- one without concurrent voting.
>
> I just want to make sure I understand: there are people who
On 14.08.20 03:41, Levi Morrison via internals wrote:
I just want to make sure I understand: there are people who think we
haven't discussed the syntax for attributes yet?
I assume this is a serious email, but I can't fathom why anyone cares.
We've discussed this subject soo much...
I am kind
15 matches
Mail list logo
