Hi internals,
Voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_list has started. The vote closes on
2020-01-20.
After discussion, the function name and signature was changed to
`array_is_list(array $array): bool`
to avoid confusion with the possibility of earlier name choices conflicting
with
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 15:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:03 PM Craig Francis
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could htmlspecialchars() use ENT_QUOTES by default?
>>
>> [...]
>
>
> I agree that we should switch the default to ENT_QUOTES. I also agree that
> we should enable
Hello Nikita.
> In addition to the functions you already list, I'd add
>function rng_bytes(RNGInterface $rng, int $length): string;
>function rng_between(RNGInterface $rng, int $min, int $max): int;
Certainly these are useful. I've added this to the RFC in TypeC.
> Just to share another
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:54 PM Máté Kocsis wrote:
>
> > Hi Internals,
> >
> > Last year, Nikita started a discussion about adding return types
> > to non-final internal methods: https://externals.io/message/106539 .
> >
> > I'd like to restart the conversation, since I've just created an
> >
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:14 AM Björn Larsson
wrote:
> Den 2020-12-07 kl. 16:49, skrev Nikita Popov:
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:49 PM Björn Larsson
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Den 2020-12-07 kl. 15:11, skrev Nikita Popov:
> >>
> >>> Hi internals,
> >>>
> >>> Picking up a loose thread:
> >>>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:25 AM Máté Kocsis wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Thanks for all the insightful feedbacks so far, I went ahead, and wrote a
> proper
> RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/max_execution_wall_time
>
> Regards:
> Máté
>
Something potentially worth pointing out (and assuming I'm
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 12:03 PM Craig Francis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could htmlspecialchars() use ENT_QUOTES by default?
>
> I recently worked on an example script, where I tried to keep it simple by
> using htmlspecialchars directly, e.g.
>
> echo "";
>
> I'd completely forgotten that single
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:54 PM Máté Kocsis wrote:
> Hi Internals,
>
> Last year, Nikita started a discussion about adding return types
> to non-final internal methods: https://externals.io/message/106539 .
>
> I'd like to restart the conversation, since I've just created an
> implementation
>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 3:40 PM Levi Morrison
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:55 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 2:28 AM tyson andre
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi internals,
> > >
> > > > I've created a straw poll for the naming pattern to use for `*any()`
> and
> > > `*all()`
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:39 AM Levi Morrison
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:55 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 2:28 AM tyson andre
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi internals,
> > >
> > > > I've created a straw poll for the naming pattern to use for `*any()` and
> > > `*all()`
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:55 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 2:28 AM tyson andre
> wrote:
>
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > > I've created a straw poll for the naming pattern to use for `*any()` and
> > `*all()` on iterables.
> > >
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:40 PM Go Kudo wrote:
> Thanks Nikita.
>
> Thanks for the input. This looks like a very smart solution.
> I've edited the RFC and added a new proposal as TypeC.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object_scope_prng
>
In addition to the functions you already list, I'd add
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:08 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> As there was no further feedback, I've opened voting on
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/restrict_globals_usage. The vote closes on
> 2021-01-06.
>
Happy to announce that the RFC has been accepted unanimously, with 48 votes
in
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:56 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, at 8:26 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > Nice work, I like the updated proposal. Some notes:
> >
> > > Similarly, enum names and case names are both case insensitive.
> >
> > I agree that enum names should be case
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:46 AM tyson andre
wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> > > > I probably brought this up in a previous thread, but I think it's
> worth
> > > > considering again here, given recent changes to the RFC:
> > > >
> > > > I think it would make more sense to introduce this as `function
>
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 2:28 AM tyson andre
wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> > I've created a straw poll for the naming pattern to use for `*any()` and
> `*all()` on iterables.
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/any_all_on_iterable_straw_poll
> >
> > Background: The RFC
16 matches
Mail list logo
