On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 3:50 PM Mark Randall wrote:
>
> On 25/04/2021 20:25, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > It includes an implementation by Joe Watkins that is already about 95%
> > complete. (There's some edge cases he's still sorting out, but all of the
> > typical cases should work already.) Mo
On 25/04/2021 20:25, Larry Garfield wrote:
It includes an implementation by Joe Watkins that is already about 95%
complete. (There's some edge cases he's still sorting out, but all of the
typical cases should work already.) Most of the design work comes from Levi
Morrison and Paul Crovella.
On 29.05.2021 at 10:02, Mel Dafert wrote:
>> Agreed with Nikita. There's no compelling reason to add double-API style
>> anymore. It may take a second RFC to modify this one to remove those,
>> technically, but I'd vote for it.
>
> Should this new RFC then only apply to IntlDatePatternGenerato
>Agreed with Nikita. There's no compelling reason to add double-API style
>anymore. It may take a second RFC to modify this one to remove those,
>technically, but I'd vote for it.
Should this new RFC then only apply to IntlDatePatternGenerator, or should it
also
clarify that future additions
