-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Today I sent 2 e-mails to lice...@zend.com, one from
(signed), one from
with the following content:
= START EMAIL =
Hello,
I have found a few issues with the header we usually found in PHP's source
code as well as with the license
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, at 9:03 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I would like to propose allowing the use of "new" inside various
> initializer expressions: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/new_in_initializers
>
> In particular, this allows specifying object default values for properties
> and
There's a couple of typos in the RFC, which Larry will fix when he has time.
There was also a typo in patch, and a fault in patch.
All fixed. pending tests, 3v4l won't update until tomorrow.
Cheers
Joe
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 13:02, Guilliam Xavier
wrote:
> Sorry, me again :s I have tested
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for voicing your concerns.
I have started writing implementation and it is definitely challenging for
me, because I am not that experienced with PHP internals yet.
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/7131
Almost every implementation requires some amount of work. I would like to
Sorry, me again :s I have tested the examples from
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/partial_function_application on
https://3v4l.org/#focus=rfc.partials and several of them currently give an
error:
- Ex 10: on the line `$c = stuff(?, ?, f: 3.5, ..., p: $point);`
=> Fatal error: Named arguments must come
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:19 PM Claude Pache
wrote:
>
> >
> > I wouldn't care about disabling autovivification on false, but I vote
> "No",
> > because I'm against the deprecation.
>
>
> Do you mean, you wouldn’t care if it went directly from “working without
> notice” in PHP 8.0 to “fatal
>
> I wouldn't care about disabling autovivification on false, but I vote "No",
> because I'm against the deprecation.
Do you mean, you wouldn’t care if it went directly from “working without
notice” in PHP 8.0 to “fatal error” in PHP 8.1? That would be extremely hostile
for large code
hi,
I wouldn't care about disabling autovivification on false, but I vote "No",
because I'm against the deprecation.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:24 PM Kamil Tekiela wrote:
> Hi Internals,
>
> I have limited the RFC to disabling autovivification on false only, which
> was the
