The RFC is in voting phase now.
I want to thank everyone involved in the discussions related to this
RFC, the ones who reviewed the code in advance, and the ones that with
some emojis in github showed their interest and support.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscr
I am glad to announce that the RFC for the "json_validate()" function
is in voting phase.
Voting started 2022-09-22 and will end on 2022-10-07 at 00:00:00 UTC
time zone (2 weeks + 1 day).
I kindly ask everyone to consider that is the first time I do an RFC,
if there is something wrong with it, I
2022年9月3日(土) 2:31 Nicolas Grekas :
> Hello everybody, hi Mate
>
> I played with readonly classes recently, to add support for them to
> lazy-loading proxy generation and I struggled upon what I see as serious
> issues.
>
> As noted in the RFC, and because the readonly flag must be set on child
> c
Hi
On 9/20/22 21:24, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
My understanding is that this attempts to gracefully handle broken cache
entries and force a rebuild if the payload is invalid.
This will fail if the serialized payload contains a malformed
DateTimeImmutable, because DateTimeImmutable will throw an Erro
Hi
On 9/21/22 11:48, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
What's your take about 8.2? As I demonstrated, readonly classes are broken
because of this propagation to child classes.
s/broken/working as expected
broken. see thread
Working as expected (or: working as designed). The behavior with regard
to
Thanks for the reply Ben, once I get home I’ll send what I did exactly.
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 17, 2022, at 11:42 AM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> On Sep 16, 2022, at 20:27, Mark Tomlin wrote:
>>>
>> To the release managers of PHP, please make sure that you do not overwrite
>> the php
>
> > When I was working on the readonly class RFC, I realized that the
>> readonly
>> > keyword very naturally fits services besides value objects. So my
>> > expectation has been that until we can fix the issue with cloning,
>> people
>> > would mainly apply readonly to services. Not that it is v
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 11:30, Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> > When I was working on the readonly class RFC, I realized that the
> readonly
> > keyword very naturally fits services besides value objects. So my
> > expectation has been that until we can fix the issue with cloning, people
>
Hi all,
> When I was working on the readonly class RFC, I realized that the readonly
> keyword very naturally fits services besides value objects. So my
> expectation has been that until we can fix the issue with cloning, people
> would mainly apply readonly to services. Not that it is very usefu
