After reading through all of the suggestions above, I have come to
this conclusion that all suggestion can be incorporated in the
following ways:
Types can exist in name spaces, Either in the global namespace or in
the user defined name spaces. If one wants to import a type from a
name space, it
2022-09-30 17:16 GMT+02:00, Larry Garfield :
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022, at 4:04 AM, Olle Härstedt wrote:
>> 2022-09-29 5:08 GMT+02:00, Hamza Ahmad :
>>> Hi Olle,
>>>
>>> I appreciate your idea of introducing a similar concept of typedef.
>>> What if you write an RFC explaining that concept. I can
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022, at 4:04 AM, Olle Härstedt wrote:
> 2022-09-29 5:08 GMT+02:00, Hamza Ahmad :
>> Hi Olle,
>>
>> I appreciate your idea of introducing a similar concept of typedef.
>> What if you write an RFC explaining that concept. I can join you
>> however in co-authoring this request.
>>
>>
2022-09-30 12:15 GMT+02:00, Lynn :
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:04 AM Olle Härstedt
> wrote:
>
>> 2022-09-29 5:08 GMT+02:00, Hamza Ahmad :
>> > Hi Olle,
>> >
>> > I appreciate your idea of introducing a similar concept of typedef.
>> > What if you write an RFC explaining that concept. I can join
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:02 PM Timmy Almroth
wrote:
> Hi @Dan, hi @Sara. Thanks for giving us your feedback on this.
>
> > I think that although the RFC discussion can go ahead without a patch,
> > it would be better to have a patch before it went to vote, as there
> > seem to be quite a
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:04 AM Olle Härstedt
wrote:
> 2022-09-29 5:08 GMT+02:00, Hamza Ahmad :
> > Hi Olle,
> >
> > I appreciate your idea of introducing a similar concept of typedef.
> > What if you write an RFC explaining that concept. I can join you
> > however in co-authoring this request.
2022-09-29 5:08 GMT+02:00, Hamza Ahmad :
> Hi Olle,
>
> I appreciate your idea of introducing a similar concept of typedef.
> What if you write an RFC explaining that concept. I can join you
> however in co-authoring this request.
>
> Seriously, I have had issues with writing such type again and
Sadly, I am disappointed with the way this suggestion has been looked down on.
On 9/29/22, Olle Härstedt wrote:
> 2022-09-29 12:33 GMT+02:00, Ryan Jentzsch :
>> `number` type But frankly this seems a bit silly and reminds me too much
>> of
>> JavaScript.
>
> That's just an example. You can also
