>From what I understand, your concern is "what if we need to change the
direction of something already decided"? For example, initially it was
decided and very well accepted private(set), but after a while the idea was
revised and it was decided that private:set would be better instead.
In this
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 8:43 PM, David Rodrigues wrote:
> Nice example!
>
>> You're saying that "public private(set)" would become available in 8.2.1
> (the late-December release of 8.2), but only in files that have
> "declare(asymmetric_visibility=1);" at the top.
>
> Yes. In that case, I should
Nice example!
> You're saying that "public private(set)" would become available in 8.2.1
(the late-December release of 8.2), but only in files that have
"declare(asymmetric_visibility=1);" at the top.
Yes. In that case, I should suggest declare(preview_asymmetric_visibility =
1), just to make
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 3:25 PM, David Rodrigues wrote:
> In order to try to organize a little better the original purpose of the
> discussion I started, I decided to "rename" this subject to something
> closer to the purpose. From "experimental features" to "feature preview".
>
> Original
In order to try to organize a little better the original purpose of the
discussion I started, I decided to "rename" this subject to something
closer to the purpose. From "experimental features" to "feature preview".
Original thread: https://marc.info/?l=php-internals=166491585711553
These are my
> On Oct 11, 2022, at 8:24 AM, Christian Schneider
> wrote:
>
> We seem to have two different views on experimental feature here: You are
> saying they could get removed again while others stated it is for stuff which
> will definitely end up in stable when the next major release is done.
>
> On 11 Oct 2022, at 15:24, Christian Schneider wrote:
>
> We seem to have two different views on experimental feature here: You are
> saying they could get removed again while others stated it is for stuff which
> will definitely end up in stable when the next major release is done.
An
Hi all,
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022, Kamil Tekiela wrote:
> For quite some time now, PHP's sanitize filters have "Rustled My
> Jimmies". These filters bother me because I can't really justify their
> existence. I can understand that a few of them are sensible and may
> come in handy, but I would like
On 10/6/2022 1:19 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
On 05/10/2022 22:35, David Gebler wrote:
There are multiple RFC standards for email address format but AFAIK
PHP's FILTER_SANITIZE_EMAIL doesn't conform to any of them.
FILTER_SANITIZE_EMAIL is a very short list of characters which claims to
be
Am 11.10.2022 um 07:09 schrieb MKS Archive :
>> On Oct 10, 2022, at 8:04 PM, David Gebler wrote:
>>
>> This is what's bothering me. Either these "experimental" features have
>> passed RFC and will be part of the language, as you've said above, or
>> they're actually experimental i.e. not
Hi all,
I'm still not convinced everyone on this thread is actually talking
about the same idea.
For instance, on whether an experimental feature would require the same
consensus as a non-experimental one:
On 11/10/2022 00:06, Mike Schinkel wrote:
If there were an RFC for Experimental
11 matches
Mail list logo
