more results on ARM:
RK3399 - Cortex-A7x
Cost 10: 10.694221 total (0.106942 per hash)
Cost 11: 21.360409 total (0.213604 per hash)
Cost 12: 42.692786 total (0.426928 per hash)
RK3399 - Cortex-A5x
Cost 10: 15.146773 total (0.151468 per hash)
Cost 11: 30.272059 total (0.302721 per hash)
Cost 12:
On 22 Sep 2023, at 08:04, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
> For the record, I voted for 11 because I think it's nicer to end users (I
> guess many don't know they could have a potential DoS vector via password
> submissions), and also because it's going to be easy to raise again in
> 8.5/9.0.
+1
I can
Hi
On 9/22/23 09:04, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
For the record, I voted for 11 because I think it's nicer to end users (I
guess many don't know they could have a potential DoS vector via password
submissions), and also because it's going to be easy to raise again in
8.5/9.0.
I was wondering if you c
Hi Larry
On 22/09/2023 01:05, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 9:26 PM, Niels Dossche wrote:
>> Hi internals
>>
>> I'd like to put a new RFC under discussion:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/xml_option_parse_huge
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Niels
>
> Seems reasonable to me at first glance.
Hi Aleksander
On 22/09/2023 07:51, Aleksander Machniak wrote:
> On 21.09.2023 23:26, Niels Dossche wrote:
>> I'd like to put a new RFC under discussion:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/xml_option_parse_huge
>
> Looking at LIBXML_PARSEHUGE at
> https://www.php.net/manual/en/libxml.constants.php
>
>
I just opened the vote for the "Increasing the default BCrypt cost" RFC.
> The RFC contains a two votes, one primary vote that requires a 2/3
> majority to pass and a secondary vote deciding on the new costs with a
> simple majority. Voting runs 2 weeks until 2023-10-05 17:45 UTC.
>
> Please find t
