Hi,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 19:00 Máté Kocsis wrote:
> As I have indicated in my last mail (
> https://externals.io/message/121164#121364), I would like to decide the
> naming question of the "le_proc_open" resource via a straw poll. Therefore,
> I've just opened the vote: https://wiki.php.net/rfc
Hi Saki,
In my opinion, this is a simple and useful bugfix + nice consistency
improvement with negligible backward compatibility break, so
I don't think it needs any vote.
Regards,
Máté
Hi Tim,
>
> I assume this should read 2023-**11**-07? This would match the 14 days
> for regular votes.
>
Yes, such a silly typo, thank you for pointing that out. The deadline is
indeed in November.
Regards,
Máté
Hi
On 10/24/23 20:00, Máté Kocsis wrote:
It is a ranked choice poll (following STV) and voting is open until
2023-10-07 18:00:00 UTC.
I assume this should read 2023-**11**-07? This would match the 14 days
for regular votes.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developm
As I have indicated in my last mail (
https://externals.io/message/121164#121364), I would like to decide the
naming question of the "le_proc_open" resource via a straw poll. Therefore,
I've just opened the vote: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/process_object_name
It is a ranked choice poll (following ST
On 23-10-2023 22:07, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
I don't quite follow. The interface would cause the engine to use the
result of an `equals()` function on the object if it implements an
interface as part of `zend_compare`? Internally there is no `==` function,
there is only the equivalent of `<=>`. To i
Hi Jordan,
On 23.10.23 22:07, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
Implementing the compare handler for an overload requires adding two new
entries to ZEND_AST_BINARY_OP because the `>` and `<` comparisons have to
be preserved in the AST in order to call the correct object handler. THAT
requires updating OpCach
