On 10-11-2023 17:51, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose a new process RFC for updates to PHP release cycle:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/release_cycle_update
This has been discussed between release managers to make sure that all are
happy as some of the points impact release
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 8:20 PM Andreas Hennings
wrote:
> So to me, this alone is an argument to implement this natively.
> The other argument is that it is kind of sad how the current functions
> don't behave as one would expect.
I'd expect there to be a larger and proportionately increasing
On 12 November 2023 16:47:37 GMT, "Máté Kocsis" wrote:
>Hi Internals,
>
>Following my straw poll about the Process resource name, I would like to
>present an RFC which clarifies the rough timeline and the BC promises of
>the "resource to object conversion" project.
>
>Link:
On 10 November 2023 23:27:35 GMT, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>On 10 November 2023 16:51:57 GMT, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>I would like to propose a new process RFC for updates to PHP release cycle:
>>
>>https://wiki.php.net/rfc/release_cycle_update
>
>Hi,
>
>I started writing a suggestion
On 10 November 2023 20:22:27 GMT, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:56 PM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
>
>I think there should be a clear cut when the RFC can be implemented and
>there should be probably still time to apply ABI breaking changes after
>that time. So we could
Le 10/11/2023 à 17:51, Jakub Zelenka a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to propose a new process RFC for updates to PHP release cycle:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/release_cycle_update
> Extending security support by one year
+1
> Allowing recent regression fixes during security support
As
2023年11月11日(土) 8:27 Rowan Tommins :
>
> On 10 November 2023 16:51:57 GMT, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I would like to propose a new process RFC for updates to PHP release cycle:
> >
> >https://wiki.php.net/rfc/release_cycle_update
>
> Hi,
>
> I started writing a suggestion that you add
