On 19 November 2023 21:28:08 GMT, Lanre Waju wrote:
>Hi, similar to the abstract and readonly modifiers to classes (similar in
>syntax only), I propose a class level "static" modifier that ensures:
Hi Lanre,
There was a proposal for this several years ago which was declined at the
voting
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 17:14 Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> I will personally vote against this if there is no is_resource
> change as I think it's just too big BC break even for 9.0 - it will likely
> require massive update of many code bases.
As someone maintaining a large code-base going
Hi again,
> Super on board with this
Sorry for top posting everyone, my bad, forgot to delete the rest of the
message :)
Regards,
Daniil Gentili
19 nov 2023 22:28:16 Lanre Waju :
> Hi, similar to the abstract and readonly modifiers to classes (similar in
> syntax only), I propose a class level "static" modifier that ensures:
>
> 1. The class cannot be instantiated and will throw an exception if attempted.
>
> 2. All methods and
Hi, similar to the abstract and readonly modifiers to classes (similar
in syntax only), I propose a class level "static" modifier that ensures:
1. The class cannot be instantiated and will throw an exception if
attempted.
2. All methods and variables in the class are implicitly static.
3.
Hi Frederik
On 16/11/2023 20:34, Frederik Bosch wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 16-10-2023 23:19, Niels Dossche wrote:
>> Sorry for the resend... I accidentally replied to you only without including
>> the list the first time.
>>
>> On 15/10/2023 21:37, Frederik Bosch wrote:
>>> Dear Niels,
>>>
>>>
