Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC proposal: worker mode primitives for SAPIs

2024-01-01 Thread Rowan Tommins
I'm running out of different ways to say the same thing, and not really sure which part of my previous messages people haven't understood. I'm really not saying anything very controversial or complicated, just "had you considered that style B would offer these additional possibilities over

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC proposal: worker mode primitives for SAPIs

2024-01-01 Thread Robert Landers
On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 12:18 PM Rowan Tommins wrote: > > On 31 December 2023 16:31:31 GMT, Pierre Joye wrote: > > >php handles this in threadsafe mode > > Depending on your exact definition of "php", this is either irrelevant or > just plain wrong. > > If you mean "the HTTP SAPIs shipped with

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC proposal: worker mode primitives for SAPIs

2024-01-01 Thread Pierre Joye
On Mon, Jan 1, 2024, 6:18 PM Rowan Tommins wrote: > On 31 December 2023 16:31:31 GMT, Pierre Joye > wrote: > > >php handles this in threadsafe mode > > Depending on your exact definition of "php", this is either irrelevant or > just plain wrong. > > If you mean "the HTTP SAPIs shipped with

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC proposal: worker mode primitives for SAPIs

2024-01-01 Thread Rowan Tommins
On 31 December 2023 16:31:31 GMT, Pierre Joye wrote: >php handles this in threadsafe mode Depending on your exact definition of "php", this is either irrelevant or just plain wrong. If you mean "the HTTP SAPIs shipped with official builds of PHP", then it's true, none handle multiple