Hi, Internals
We got feature request for "Multibyte for ucfirst function".
https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/13075
I think make sense for implement this function, but I don't know well
about not-latin language.
I have a question.
gnutix san pick up sample to below:
Thank you for your reply. Forgive me for a few mistakes. I'm new to
Gmail... Is this line "top-post" ?
Le sam. 6 janv. 2024 à 00:48, Larry Garfield a
écrit :
> What you can do, as Rowan noted, is this:
>
> https://3v4l.org/cEmcC
>
> I understood your code. It is interesting when you do not know
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, at 5:16 PM, Mönôme Epson wrote:
> -- Forwarded message -
> I try to follow the procedure of: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto
>
> It seems to me that list() is not clearly specified.
> I wanted to know your opinions on this.
>
>
> For example :
> $key = "a";
>
-- Forwarded message -
De : Mönôme Epson
Date: sam. 6 janv. 2024 à 00:15
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] clarify the destructuring list() concept
To: Rowan Tommins
Le ven. 5 janv. 2024 à 23:31, Rowan Tommins a
écrit :
>
> I'm not sure what your question is
I try to follow the
On 5 January 2024 20:44:00 GMT, "Mönôme Epson" wrote:
>Hello internals,
>
>> The purpose of list() is to assign a list of variables.
>
>What should be the underlying concept behind the list() language construct?
>
>I propose that list() is the reciprocal of array().
>That is, if array() is a
Hello internals,
> The purpose of list() is to assign a list of variables.
What should be the underlying concept behind the list() language construct?
I propose that list() is the reciprocal of array().
That is, if array() is a function call, then list() is the signature of a
function.
Do you
Hi,
I have just opened the voting on the "Policy Repository" RFC. It will
run until January 22nd, 2024 at 08:00 UTC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/policy-repository#voting_choices
cheers,
Derick
--
https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io
Author of Xdebug. Like it?
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 9:40 AM Michał Marcin Brzuchalski <
michal.brzuchal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are indeed dozens of libraries already working with PSR nicely but
> IMHO
> the API should provide all the necessary information in a way that allows
> the construction of such objects,
> but
Hi Máté,
I have one question. If the primary stream resources get the
is_resource hack, what hampers the changes from landing in a minor
version? I'd assume that the migration would be mostly seamless. Is it
the get_resource_type checks? Is it because is_resource also checks
whether the resource
On 5 January 2024 12:18:51 GMT, Robert Landers wrote:
>This is easy to handle from C. If the callback takes an argument,
>don't fill in the super-globals.
Again, that's compatible only in a narrow sense: it provides both APIs on any
run-time which can do so safely.
You still have an
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 13:19 Robert Landers
napisał(a):
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:59 AM Rowan Tommins
> wrote:
>
> > > Globals is how this works (atm)
> >
> > It's how it works for native SAPIs. It's not, as far as I know, how any
> worker system other than FrankenPHP has implemented its API.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:59 AM Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> On 5 January 2024 09:02:05 GMT, Robert Landers
> wrote:
> > I don't think they are fundamentally incompatible. If we look at
> >FrankenPHP's implementation, you pass a callback that gets called when
> >there is a request.
>
> No, you pass
On 5 January 2024 09:02:05 GMT, Robert Landers wrote:
> I don't think they are fundamentally incompatible. If we look at
>FrankenPHP's implementation, you pass a callback that gets called when
>there is a request.
No, you pass a callback which is called exactly once, for the next request. You
Hi,
> But holding up the entire conversation because these things don't even
> exist,
BTW, I'm not asking to wait for the implementation of a native event loop
before implementing a worker mode, I'm asking to design the worker mode API in
a way that is compatible with an eventual native event
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:47 AM Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> On 5 January 2024 06:55:34 GMT, Robert Landers
> wrote:
>
> >I already said this, but to reiterate: I, personally, hear what you
> >are saying and largely agree with you; however, before we can really
> >have any kind of discussion on
Hi Everyone,
As mentioned a few days ago, I've just opened the vote about resource to
object conversion.
The vote will be open for 2 weeks.
RFC link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/resource_to_object_conversion
Discussion thread: https://externals.io/message/121660
Regards,
Máté
16 matches
Mail list logo
