On Mon, May 26, 2025, at 5:47 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Arnaud, Ilija and I would like to propose making OPcache a non-optional
> part of PHP starting with PHP 8.5.
>
> Please find the RFC including more details at:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/make_opcache_required
>
> As of now OPcache ca
On Mon, May 26, 2025, at 1:14 PM, Dmitry Derepko wrote:
> Thanks for your replies.
>
> There is no big deal for me to use `=>` instead of `=`. Just used to
> use `=`. I’ll change it then.
>
> Thought there would be more thoughts against the RFC, but the voting
> will show these votes.
> Could so
Hi,
Working through this https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/18651/files, do
not mind waiting for PHP 9 if needs be. Let me know what you think.
Cheers.
Hi internals,
Voting is now open for this RFC.
* RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/final_promotion
* Discussion thread: https://externals.io/message/126926
Voting will end 2025-06-09 at end-of-day UTC.
-Daniel
Hi Dmitry
Thanks for your interest in improving PHP.
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:25 AM Dmitry Derepkowrote:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/single-expression-functions
In the "Single-Expression functions in other languages" section, at least the
Rust and Swift examples are wrong, as s
Hey all,
It took me a while, but I'm finally caught up with this thread, and would like
to give my 2 cents.
On 25 May 2025, at 23:17, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>
> On 25/05/2025 21:28, Larry Garfield wrote:
>> Even if we develop some way such that in Foo.php, loading the class
>> \Beep\Boo
Hi
On 5/26/25 20:14, Dmitry Derepko wrote:
Could someone help me with the RFC process? Should I open the vote?
Please find https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto for an explanation of the
process.
An RFC needs *at least* two weeks of discussion, depending on the
complexity of the RFC it should pro
Thanks for your replies.
There is no big deal for me to use `=>` instead of `=`. Just used to use
`=`. I’ll change it then.
Thought there would be more thoughts against the RFC, but the voting will
show these votes.
Could someone help me with the RFC process? Should I open the vote?
--
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 08:03 Volker Dusch wrote:
> Version 1.1 Update: Array syntax over named arguments.
>
> Thank you everyone for the discussion and for improving this RFC.
> I'm very happy with the updates we made thanks to your feedback on and off
> list.
>
> The main idea of this RFC wa
Hi
Clarifying on the technical questions.
Am 2025-05-26 16:37, schrieb Nicolas Grekas:
I think the RFC is missing a few bits to be complete:
- making "clone" a function means suddenly a "use clone;" or a "\clone"
is
going to be needed to not get a perf hit, isn't it? But since $y =
clone
$x
I really like the idea. We use the Embed SAPI statically linked and at the
moment we need to take great care to bundle the OPcache extension. This
will make it a lot easier for us. A big +1 from my point of view!
Regards,
Michael
Tim Düsterhus schrieb am Mo. 26. Mai 2025 um 12:49:
> Hi
>
> Arna
Hi Volker,
Thanks for the update.
Le lun. 26 mai 2025 à 16:05, Volker Dusch a
écrit :
> Version 1.1 Update: Array syntax over named arguments.
>
> Thank you everyone for the discussion and for improving this RFC. I'm very
> happy with the updates we made thanks to your feedback on and off list.
Version 1.1 Update: Array syntax over named arguments.
Thank you everyone for the discussion and for improving this RFC. I'm very
happy with the updates we made thanks to your feedback on and off list.
The main idea of this RFC was to have as little of a footprint as possible
and make it feel nat
Hi
Arnaud, Ilija and I would like to propose making OPcache a non-optional
part of PHP starting with PHP 8.5.
Please find the RFC including more details at:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/make_opcache_required
As of now OPcache cannot be statically compiled into the PHP binary at
all, which is t
14 matches
Mail list logo
