On 12-apr-2010, at 10:20, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 17-mrt-2010, at 19:09, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote
Hi
Ulf already indicated this in a bug report, but I'd like to bring it up here
too:
There's no PHP 6 any more. What shall happen to those reports: close, bogus,
test against 5.3, test against new trunk?
There's a lot of open PHP6 / SVN snaps bugs, some of them obviously not valid
anymore
On 17-mrt-2010, at 19:09, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
Because
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:00, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
2010/3/16 Felix De Vliegher felix.devlieg...@gmail.com:
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek =
getting an array value based
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
Hello Felix !
Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
Best regards,
Fred
Because the functionality isn't exactly the same. ArrayIterator::seek() only
sets the array pointer, array_seek would also return the value + have
fseek()-like
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
Because the functionality isn't exactly the same.
ArrayIterator::seek() only sets the array pointer
On 17-mrt-2010, at 19:09, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
Because
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek = getting
an array value based on the position (or offset, if you want to call it like
that), and not the key of the item)
Basically you can
is
misleading (pls reattach the patch as .txt while being at it :). Does
it set the position (_seek) or does it return the value of a given
position (_get_pos)? or both (no idea :)?
Cheers,
Cheers,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Felix De Vliegher
felix.devlieg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On 16-mrt-2010, at 17:07, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch
with .txt extension :)
Does it also seek the array pointer
Hi
As SEEK_END only makes sense with zero or negative offsets (for arrays anyway),
I've come up with an implementation for SEEK_END:
http://phpbenelux.eu/array_seek.patch.txt
So you can do:
$arr = array('a', 'b', 'c', 'd');
echo array_seek($arr, -2, SEEK_END); // outputs 'b'
echo
Hi Lukas
Sounds like a good idea to channel the volume on this list.
I was wondering, would the usergroup part be a replacement for the
moderated messages by regular users or would it be an addition to it?
I mean, we should better start promoting this one moderator-per-
usergroup to
Writing PHPT tests (I already wrote about 35 tests, which can be found on
http://testfest.php.net).
pierre, zoe and lsmith should be able to confirm my cvs account request.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
13 matches
Mail list logo
