On 12 Aug 2010, at 16:04, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
While discussing this via IRC it was suggested to create an
Experimental top-level category on pecl.php.net and put them there. To
me this looks like a good proposal. From there they can easily be picked
up, be extended, provide ideas for
On 11 Aug 2010, at 15:13, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Maybe I'm old school, but in my opinion, trunk should only contain
agreed-upon features. It should also always build and pass tests
successfully. It's not the wild-west version of PHP, it's PHP's next
version, in progress. Want to work on
On 11 Aug 2010, at 17:01, Elizabeth M Smith wrote:
Well this is turning into a real flamefest.
I'm now totally confused to be honest.
Personally I really HATE the 5.3 implementation of typehints - heck you
can't even typehint arrays with an arrayobject instance, it's not hinting in
any
On 17 Jun 2010, at 20:14, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I know the discussion is about scalar type hints. But what is with a
object type hint as base for all objects?
When it makes sense to accept any object, regardless of the class, but not
other types? I wonder if it's really a common
My feeling is that they should all be static consts unless explicitly accessed
outside of the object module or changed.Since typically they're a list of
function/method entries only accessed by a class or zend_module_entry that is
really the case. Without the static we're polluting the
example static const did have internal linkage, const on its own in the
global scope did not. You still need static.
Melanie
On 14 Jun 2010, at 12:28, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:56:57 +0100, Melanie Rhianna Lewis
cybersp...@php.net wrote:
My feeling is that they should all
