Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are absolutely ways to do this purely at the application level.
It just
seems that it'd be a really clean, easy to program, easy to understand
methodology to pass the key value to the request for a new instance, and
get
back either a new
Yes, Pool. I just said that it is Singleton for multiple objects which
in fact is pool.
..hence it's not a Singleton. :)
Cheers,
Michael
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Exactly what I thought when reading the original post :)
- Michael
why not add it with the {} operators then?
-sterling
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:07:05 -0400, Ilia Alshanetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am wondering what are people's opinions on adding support for negative
string offsets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, PHP's object model is most similar to the Java one, so
Markus' comparisons make most sense in my eyes.
The object model might be similar to Java (it's a very simple one which
I like) but the language is not and *should not be* IMHO. Java got much
too
Marcus Boerger wrote:
In no language i know (c++, delphi, java as the popular ones) a ctor
First of all I'm a bit sad that you compare PHP with 'old' static OO
languages, not 'modern' dynamic ones like Python or Ruby. Wrong focus
IMHO.
First of all, PHP's object model is most similar to the
On Apr 12, 2004, at 10:58 AM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There is 1 problem with this approach. Currently an uncaught
exceptions
results in a fatal error (E_ERROR) meaning that if a particular
method throws
an exceptions it MUST be
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Huh? What platform crashes? Can you send reproducible C code?
int main(void) {
long a = -2147483648;
long b = -1;
long c;
c = a % b;
}
Does anybody has a clue *why*
