On 05-07-2020 09:35, Michał Marcin Brzuchalski wrote:
> The proposal is to allow two statements to skip parentheses so they don't
> look like expressions.
I like small improvements like this one. They may not look like much but
they do add up to arrive at a cleaner language in the long run.
Hey Michał,
Personally, I think instead of making `declare(strict_types=1);` to look
more like a constant, we should make it look more like a function.
Since it seems that the named parameters RFC is going to be accepted, I
think allowing for alternative `declare(strict_types: 1);` syntax would
Hi Nikita,
pon., 13 lip 2020 o 12:41 Nikita Popov napisał(a):
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 9:36 AM Michał Marcin Brzuchalski <
> michal.brzuchal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> I realise we're tight to the deadline but from my calculations,
>> this RFC should fit with 2w discussion
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 9:36 AM Michał Marcin Brzuchalski <
michal.brzuchal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I realise we're tight to the deadline but from my calculations,
> this RFC should fit with 2w discussion and 2w voting before feature freeze.
>
> The proposal is to allow two
Hi internals,
I realise we're tight to the deadline but from my calculations,
this RFC should fit with 2w discussion and 2w voting before feature freeze.
The proposal is to allow two statements to skip parentheses so they don't
look like expressions.
This goes to `declare` and `__halt_compiler`.
