On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 06/02/15 17:44, Daniel Lowrey wrote:
If you doubt that this is a solved problem in userland consider the
performance of my own 100% userland HTTP client demonstrated here
without the use of curl or any other
On 06/02/15 17:44, Daniel Lowrey wrote:
If you doubt that this is a solved problem in userland consider the
performance of my own 100% userland HTTP client demonstrated here
without the use of curl or any other extensions:
https://gist.github.com/rdlowrey/54171625334670ccb9f5
I can
On 06/02/15 17:44, Daniel Lowrey wrote:
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of the
things mentioned previously.
I you still find anything lacking, please let me know, so I can
expand the
RFC accordingly.
And of course, everything else is up for discussion.
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of the
things mentioned previously.
I you still find anything lacking, please let me know, so I can expand
the
RFC accordingly.
And of course, everything else is up for discussion.
I may not have been clear before, but just
Hi Stas!
On 30/01/15 20:10, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of the
things mentioned previously.
Thank you, Michael, this is much better!
I would still like to hear more about 2 extensions, especially about
raphf - it
Hi!
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of the
things mentioned previously.
Thank you, Michael, this is much better!
I would still like to hear more about 2 extensions, especially about
raphf - it seems to be some framework for handling persistent resources,
but
Michael Wallner wrote in message
news:bd568277-5a74-4a66-ac5d-173da93fa...@php.net...
snip
I think PHP is, and should be, a language where you’re more successful in
getting things done, instead of having to do it right in one way only.
Well said! I couldn't agree more.
--
Tony Marston
Hi Mike,
Awesome work!
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of the
things mentioned previously.
I you still find anything lacking, please let me know, so I can expand the
RFC accordingly.
Hi Mike,
On 29 Jan 2015, at 11:14, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of the
things mentioned previously.
I you still find anything lacking, please let me know, so I can expand the
RFC accordingly.
The RFC is an
Hi!
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of the things
mentioned previously.
I you still find anything lacking, please let me know, so I can expand the RFC
accordingly.
And of course, everything else is up for discussion.
Thanks,
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP
On 29/01/15 12:32, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hi Mike,
Awesome work!
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net
mailto:m...@php.net wrote:
I’ve rewritten the RFC for pecl_http and hopefully addressed most of
the things mentioned previously.
I you still find
* Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?
possible points:
- PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does
- PHP-FIG focus on frameworks; pecl_http in core is useable without
dependencies by every simple script
- PSR-7 is a moving target; pecl_http exists for ten
On 29 Jan 2015, at 12:18, Crypto Compress cryptocompr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
* Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?
possible points:
- PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does
- native implementations should be faster
I don’t see how that’s relevant:
On 29/01/15 11:40, Andrea Faulds wrote:
* Why do we need pecl/http?
* Why should pecl/http be merged into PHP core?
* Why should pecl/http be enabled by default?
* Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?
* What does it offer over PHP’s existing HTTP capabilities?
* Why
On 1/29/15 6:40 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
On 29 Jan 2015, at 12:18, Crypto Compress cryptocompr...@googlemail.com wrote:
* Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?
possible points:
- PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does
- native implementations should be
Hi all,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Crypto Compress
cryptocompr...@googlemail.com wrote:
possible points:
- PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does
- PHP-FIG focus on frameworks; pecl_http in core is useable without
dependencies by every simple script
- PSR-7 is a moving
Hi Daniel!
On 30 01 2015, at 07:28, Daniel Lowrey rdlow...@php.net wrote:
Hi Mike :)
I'd like to chime in on the discussion ...
1. There is a lot of *really* useful functionality in pecl/http that IMO
should be bundled with the standard PHP distribution.
This, to me, means things
17 matches
Mail list logo
