On 6/3/2017 2:03 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these discussions
> in the community:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
Last call for comments. Four weeks have passed and I would like to start
the voting phase on this one. Voting will s
On 6/3/2017 2:03 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these discussions
> in the community:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
Last heads-up, voting will start tomorrow!
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: Ope
On 6/11/2017 12:35 AM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 10 June 2017 at 21:57, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>>
>> This RFC is only
>
> "When collaborating with others – especially when designers and
> programmers are part of the mix – watch out for these dirty four
> letter words: Need Must Can’t Easy Just Only Fa
On 10 June 2017 at 21:57, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>
> This RFC is only
"When collaborating with others – especially when designers and
programmers are part of the mix – watch out for these dirty four
letter words: Need Must Can’t Easy Just Only Fast"
https://signalvnoise.com/posts/439-four-letter-wor
On 6/10/2017 10:54 PM, Niklas Keller wrote:
> The minimum discussion period is two weeks.
>
> Regards, Niklas
Not according to our rules, no:
> There'd be a minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the
> language is brought up on this list and when it's voted on is
> required. Other
2017-06-10 20:46 GMT+02:00 Fleshgrinder :
> On 6/3/2017 2:03 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> > As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these discussions
> > in the community:
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
> >
>
> I am planning to put this to vote tomorrow, unless somebody
On 6/3/2017 2:03 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these discussions
> in the community:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
I am planning to put this to vote tomorrow, unless somebody has serious
concerns and raises them here. The minimum d
On 6/3/2017 4:07 PM, Rowan Collins wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I think 3-way votes are potentially confusing, and saying it's a
> "simple 50%+1 majority vote" doesn't really make sense if it's not a
> yes/no question.
>
> What if the vote splits 49/48/3? Does "do nothing" win because the
> other opt
On 3 June 2017 13:03:20 BST, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these
>discussions
>in the community:
>
>https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
Hi Richard,
I think 3-way votes are potentially confusing, and saying it's a "simple 50%+1
majority vote" doesn
On 6/3/2017 3:20 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 3 June 2017 at 13:03, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
> For the RFC to be precise, it probably needs to specify the rules for
> initialisations explicitly.
>
> Presumably the same as acronyms?
>
> cheers
> Dan
>
Thank
On 3 June 2017 at 13:03, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
For the RFC to be precise, it probably needs to specify the rules for
initialisations explicitly.
Presumably the same as acronyms?
cheers
Dan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubsc
As previously announced, I would like to set an end to these discussions
in the community:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
