Laruence laruence at php.net writes:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Nikita Popov nikita.ppv at gmail.com
wrote:
Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is the complement of the
Yo-An Lin wrote on 05/06/2015 06:51:
Laruence laruence at php.net writes:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Nikita Popov nikita.ppv at gmail.com
wrote:
Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
If staying consistent with foreach is not wanted (or this is not
How calling a function can be consistent with foreach? Those are
different things. Calling a function should be consistent with all other
cases of
On 31 August 2013 03:21, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
This is very special use case to be hidden in library functions, I don't
think we need to have language syntax specially directed at that, at the
cost of making it overall more complex and hard to understand. I can see
what add
On 30 August 2013 08:23, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
The syntax it introduces looks as follows:
$db-query($query, ...$params);
Somebody was going to do this, and it's going to be me. Sorry. We were
doing so well.
I don't like the ellipsis. I could just about deal with it for
Big +1 from me, though as Stas pointed out, multiple unpacks in a single
call don't really work with PHP parameter typing, so I'd make that use an
error.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
On 30 August 2013 08:23, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
The
hi Nikita!
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is the complement of the variadics RFC: It is not about
declaring
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
And something like:
test(1, 2, ...[3, 4], 5, 6, ...[7, 8])
looks plain weird. What would be the use case for doing something like
that?
No use case at all. This is a technical specification, so I write down what
is
Hi!
Assuming you mean call_user_func_array, yes. This is just syntax sugar
for call_user_func_array. Advantages of this syntax over cufa are
outlined here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking#advantages_over_call_user_func_array
The only case that I see that could make sense is
Hi!
A good example would be function forwarding for variadic functions,
without resorting to call_user_func_array.
What's wrong with resorting to call_user_func_array?
call_user_func_array is a PHP function and not some dark magic that one
should avoid using unless it is absolutely must.
--
2013/8/30 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
Hi!
A good example would be function forwarding for variadic functions,
without resorting to call_user_func_array.
What's wrong with resorting to call_user_func_array?
call_user_func_array is a PHP function and not some dark magic that one
Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is the complement of the variadics RFC: It is not about
declaring variadic functions, but about calling them.
The syntax it introduces looks as follows:
2013/8/30 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
Hi!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is the complement of the variadics RFC: It is not about
declaring variadic functions, but about calling them.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
Assuming you mean call_user_func_array, yes. This is just syntax sugar
for call_user_func_array. Advantages of this syntax over cufa are
outlined here:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is the complement of the variadics RFC: It is not about
declaring variadic
On 08/30/2013 05:23 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is the complement of the variadics RFC: It is not about
declaring variadic functions, but about calling them.
Hi!
This RFC proposes to add a syntax for argument unpacking:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/argument_unpacking
Basically, this is the complement of the variadics RFC: It is not about
declaring variadic functions, but about calling them.
This is just another way of doing call_user_func,
2013/8/30 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
don't see a reason why one should explicitly disallow doing multiple
unpacks.
Because it makes very hard to understand what's going on and makes no
sense semantically.
As you can see, here two arguments are unpacked in one call.
This is
Hi!
Not sure I get what you mean. All languages with argument unpacking
allow this. It's not commonly needed, but there are uses for it and I
I mean this:
a = [0,3]
range(*a)
[0, 1, 2]
a = [1]; b = [2]
range(*a, *b)
File stdin, line 1
range(*a, *b)
^
SyntaxError:
Hi!
Am 31.8.2013 um 00:27 schrieb Lazare Inepologlou linep...@gmail.com:
2013/8/30 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
don't see a reason why one should explicitly disallow doing multiple
unpacks.
Because it makes very hard to understand what's going on and makes no
sense semantically.
Hi!
function short (...$args) {
if (count($args))
return long(...$args, some value);
}
This is exactly the problem. Since $args has undefined number of
arguments, there's no way to determine where some value ends up. Which
means it's impossible to understand what's going on here.
2013/8/31 Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com
Hi!
Am 31.8.2013 um 00:27 schrieb Lazare Inepologlou linep...@gmail.com:
2013/8/30 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
don't see a reason why one should explicitly disallow doing multiple
unpacks.
Because it makes very hard to understand
Hi!
Am 31.8.2013 um 01:39 schrieb Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com:
Hi!
function short (...$args) {
if (count($args))
return long(...$args, some value);
}
This is exactly the problem. Since $args has undefined number of
arguments, there's no way to determine where some
Hi!
Am 31.8.2013 um 01:39 schrieb Lazare Inepologlou linep...@gmail.com:
2013/8/31 Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com
Hi!
Am 31.8.2013 um 00:27 schrieb Lazare Inepologlou linep...@gmail.com:
2013/8/30 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
don't see a reason why one should explicitly
25 matches
Mail list logo
