On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>
> I agree, this change makes sense this way and is compatible to the way
> hooks work right now. This change can be part of the grand refactoring
> later on.
7.0 is indeed the best time to do it.
> Refactoring the whole extension API is
I updated the RFC to include a paragraph on this. The change should be
included as-is and then be part of a potential refactoring, should one
happen.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:39
On 4 December 2014 at 14:26, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Eber
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Ebe
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Eberlei
> >> wrote:
> >> > Good morning,
> >> >
> >> > This is just a
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Eberlei
>>> wrote:
>>> > Good morning,
>>> >
>>> > This is just a very small
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Eberlei
>> wrote:
>> > Good morning,
>> >
>> > This is just a very small change, I propose this RFC for discussion to
>> > turn
>> > the
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Eberlei
> wrote:
> > Good morning,
> >
> > This is just a very small change, I propose this RFC for discussion to
> turn
> > the C function "gc_collect_cycles" into a pointer.
> >
> > https://wiki.php
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> This is just a very small change, I propose this RFC for discussion to turn
> the C function "gc_collect_cycles" into a pointer.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/gc_fn_pointer
>
> Composer's garbage collection optimization sho
Hey:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> This is just a very small change, I propose this RFC for discussion to turn
> the C function "gc_collect_cycles" into a pointer.
yeah, this idea is better than add hardly getimeofday into gc
thanks
>
> https://wiki.
Good morning,
This is just a very small change, I propose this RFC for discussion to turn
the C function "gc_collect_cycles" into a pointer.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/gc_fn_pointer
Composer's garbage collection optimization showed that PHP Profilers fail
to capture the dynamics of GC and we need
11 matches
Mail list logo
