Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] Anonymous Classes

2015-03-27 Thread Philip Sturgeon
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Philip Sturgeon pjsturg...@gmail.com wrote: A two week discussion period has been held and there are no outstanding issues. Serialization has been disabled, and generated names have

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] Anonymous Classes

2015-03-27 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! For anyone else concerned, an anon class inside a parent class is only able to act with its public interface. Yes, that is weird, but there is currently no support in PHP for nested classes. True. I'm just thinking we'll end up in the same position as closures in 5.3 where scope support

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] Anonymous Classes

2015-03-26 Thread Pascal Martin, AFUP
Le 13/03/2015 20:33, Philip Sturgeon a écrit : https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes Hi, We've discussed this with other people at AFUP, and are on the +1 side. Thanks for this! -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] Anonymous Classes

2015-03-14 Thread Nikita Popov
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Philip Sturgeon pjsturg...@gmail.com wrote: A two week discussion period has been held and there are no outstanding issues. Serialization has been disabled, and generated names have been explained better in the newest version of the RFC

[PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] Anonymous Classes

2015-03-13 Thread Philip Sturgeon
A two week discussion period has been held and there are no outstanding issues. Serialization has been disabled, and generated names have been explained better in the newest version of the RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes The implementation needs to be updated with changes from