On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:51 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Currently, placing an attribute on property (or constant) groups is not
> allowed:
>
> This is a case that was not explicitly mentioned in the RFC and we decided
> to be conversative when landing the initial implementation.
>
>
Conservative
Hi Nikita,
> Hi internals,
>
> Currently, placing an attribute on property (or constant) groups is not
> allowed:
>
> class Foo {
> #[NonNegative]
> public int $x, $y, $z;
> }
> // Fatal error: Cannot apply attributes to a group of properties
>
> This is a case that was not explicitly
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, at 7:51 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> Currently, placing an attribute on property (or constant) groups is not
> allowed:
>
> class Foo {
> #[NonNegative]
> public int $x, $y, $z;
> }
> // Fatal error: Cannot apply attributes to a group of properties
>
And why would we want to do that?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 4:04 PM Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Probably easier/simpler to deprecate (then remove) property declaration
> groups, no?
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 14:51 Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > Currently, placing an attribute on
Probably easier/simpler to deprecate (then remove) property declaration
groups, no?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 14:51 Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> Currently, placing an attribute on property (or constant) groups is not
> allowed:
>
> class Foo {
> #[NonNegative]
> public int $x,
Hi internals,
Currently, placing an attribute on property (or constant) groups is not
allowed:
class Foo {
#[NonNegative]
public int $x, $y, $z;
}
// Fatal error: Cannot apply attributes to a group of properties
This is a case that was not explicitly mentioned in the RFC and we decided
