On 23.08.2016 at 17:03, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> personally I think that we are in general too lenient with allowing BC
> breaks in 7.1 (even though that I somehow expected this and was arguing for
> a longer release cycle for 7.0 or at least having a clear roadmap for the
> next major version) and
On 2016-08-23 18:45, Alexander Lisachenko wrote:
2016-08-23 18:05 GMT+03:00 Lauri Kenttä :
Could you do it without reflection, then? I don't think so.
Thus, I think your "use case" is broken by design.
FYI: This use case is used by Go! AOP Framework and AspectMock
libraries that can mock even
2016-08-23 18:05 GMT+03:00 Lauri Kenttä :
> Could you do it without reflection, then? I don't think so.
> Thus, I think your "use case" is broken by design.
>
FYI: This use case is used by Go! AOP Framework and AspectMock libraries
that can mock even static methods in the classes, allowing testi
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Alexander Lisachenko
>>> wrote:
2016-08-23 16:40 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
>
>>
On 2016-08-23 16:20, Alexander Lisachenko wrote:
Ok, how can I invoke Parent::whoami() with reflection and get exactly
"Child" as an output?
class Parent {
public static function whoami() {
echo static::class;
}
}
class Child extends Parent {
public static function whoami()
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Alexander Lisachenko
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2016-08-23 16:40 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
My patch allows that, but I can't find a use case to it.
>>>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Alexander Lisachenko
> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-08-23 16:40 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
>>>
>>> My patch allows that, but I can't find a use case to it.
>>
>>
>>
>> My use case for that was decorating of static methods
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Alexander Lisachenko
wrote:
>
> 2016-08-23 16:40 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
>>
>> My patch allows that, but I can't find a use case to it.
>
>
>
> My use case for that was decorating of static methods with additional
> behaviour, so it's possible to cache the result
2016-08-23 16:40 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
> My patch allows that, but I can't find a use case to it.
My use case for that was decorating of static methods with additional
behaviour, so it's possible to cache the result of static methods, etc.
Unfortunately, reflection API doesn't provide me suc
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Alexander Lisachenko
wrote:
>
> 2016-08-23 16:13 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
>>
>>
>> No, How can this be ? B extends A , not A extends B ...
>> In this case, B'sfoo() will be called , which is the equivalent to
>> having a reflectionMethod from B , so useless to me.
On 23/08/2016 14:20, Alexander Lisachenko wrote:
2016-08-23 16:13 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli mailto:jpa...@php.net>>:
No, How can this be ? B extends A , not A extends B ...
In this case, B'sfoo() will be called , which is the equivalent to
having a reflectionMethod from B , so useles
2016-08-23 16:13 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
>
> No, How can this be ? B extends A , not A extends B ...
> In this case, B'sfoo() will be called , which is the equivalent to
> having a reflectionMethod from B , so useless to me.
Ok, how can I invoke Parent::whoami() with reflection and get exactl
On 23/08/2016 13:56, Alexander Lisachenko wrote:
For static methods this could be object (why not - it will be ignored)
Allowing a parameter and then completely ignoring it is what got us into
this situation in the first place.
Why does this...
$a = new reflectionMethod('A', 'foo');
$a->inv
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Alexander Lisachenko
wrote:
>
> 2016-08-23 16:01 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
>>
>> This :
>>
>> class A { public static function foo() { } }
>> class B extends A { public static function foo() { } }
>>
>> $a = new reflectionMethod('A', 'foo');
>> $a->invoke('B');
>
>
2016-08-23 16:01 GMT+03:00 Julien Pauli :
> This :
>
> class A { public static function foo() { } }
> class B extends A { public static function foo() { } }
>
> $a = new reflectionMethod('A', 'foo');
> $a->invoke('B');
>
It's perfect way for me.
Just to be sure: in this case we will invoke A::f
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Alexander Lisachenko
wrote:
>
> 2016-08-23 14:51 GMT+03:00 Christoph M. Becker :
>>
>> I suggest to deprecate all other types than NULL as first arg for static
>> methods, because passing an int, for instance, makes even less sense as
>> Rowan has already pointed o
2016-08-23 14:51 GMT+03:00 Christoph M. Becker :
> I suggest to deprecate all other types than NULL as first arg for static
> methods, because passing an int, for instance, makes even less sense as
> Rowan has already pointed out elsewhere in this thread.
>
Alternative suggestion (vote for Julie
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 23.08.2016 at 13:36, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Christoph M. Becker
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23.08.2016 at 00:25, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rowan Collins
wrote:
On 23.08.2016 at 13:36, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Christoph M. Becker
> wrote:
>
>> On 23.08.2016 at 00:25, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rowan Collins
>>> wrote:
Christoph already linked to this comment in the source
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 23.08.2016 at 00:25, Levi Morrison wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rowan Collins
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Christoph already linked to this comment in the source
>>> [https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/PHP-7.0.10/ext/reflec
On 2016-08-23 11:30, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 23.08.2016 at 00:25, Levi Morrison wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rowan Collins
wrote:
In my opinion, the best "fix", if something needs to change, would
be to reject anything other than null; that anything else works
appears to jus
On 23.08.2016 at 00:25, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rowan Collins
> wrote:
>>
>> Christoph already linked to this comment in the source
>> [https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/PHP-7.0.10/ext/reflection/php_reflection.c#L3197-L3202]:
>>
>>> /* In case this is a static
22 matches
Mail list logo
