Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I agree too. I meant we shouldn't branch before RC1 or later. Of course not. Branch right after PHP 5.0.0 golden goes out the door. - Andrei -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 08:34 AM 1/14/2004 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we then > > know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes > > go

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we then > > know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes > > going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we then > know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes > going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML. > What change do you want to make. If it's minor I th

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. That's how we usually do it too, and I agree that that would be the best point to branch. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Andrey Hristov
Hi, Andi Gutmans wrote: At 01:18 PM 1/14/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote: I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we then know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML. What change do you want

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 01:30 PM 1/14/2004 +0100, Edin Kadribasic wrote: I think its way too early for that. PHP_5_0 branch should IMHO be created after php-5.0.0 has been released at the earliest. Even better, but RC1 is a bare minimum IMO. Andi -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 01:18 PM 1/14/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote: Hi, so PHP5 (currenlty HEAD) is feature freezed and therefore new code goes nowhere, only bugfixes go to php-src module since PHP_4_3 is also feature freezed. Is it ok, to branch PHP5_0 from HEAD so new developments to go to HEAD and bugfixes wi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Edin Kadribasic
8 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD Hi, so PHP5 (currenlty HEAD) is feature freezed and therefore new code goes nowhere, only bugfixes go to php-src module since PHP_4_3 is also feature freezed. Is it ok, to branch PHP5_0 from HEAD so new developments to go to HEAD and bugfixes will go to P

[PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

2004-01-14 Thread Andrey Hristov
Hi, so PHP5 (currenlty HEAD) is feature freezed and therefore new code goes nowhere, only bugfixes go to php-src module since PHP_4_3 is also feature freezed. Is it ok, to branch PHP5_0 from HEAD so new developments to go to HEAD and bugfixes will go to PHP5_0 and HEAD. I know that this way we will