On 14/06/2016 20:11, Leigh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 at 22:30 Matthew Browne wrote:
Hi,
What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1"
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 at 22:30 Matthew Browne wrote:
> Hi,
> What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
> official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
> consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
> return types
Hi,
What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC: