Wez Furlong wrote:
On 12/8/06, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as finding a maintainer is concerned, we can check again with
Wez. If
he doesn't have time we should probably be able to find someone who
can look
into some of those bugs. Despite bugs, I've never had issues with it.
On 12/20/2006 12:26 PM, Andy Wharmby wrote:
Hi Internals
I am still pretty new to PHP but having spent the last couple of
months reviewing the PHP code and
getting to know how PHP ticks I would be happy to volunteer some time
take a look at some of the
outstanding issues with the COM
On 12/8/06, Ilia Alshanetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of bugs
(26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
But aside from those problems (which I suspect are mostly duplicates),
it works fine for the majority of users.
On 12/8/06, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as finding a maintainer is concerned, we can check again with Wez. If
he doesn't have time we should probably be able to find someone who can look
into some of those bugs. Despite bugs, I've never had issues with it.
I'm currently (way!)
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
COM:
-1. Its core for windows, has little impact on non-windows users other
than a few extra KB to download, and works for the most part.
mhash:
sockets:
+1 for both
Rob
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hello Ilia,
-1 (*), +1, +1, but I think you mean 5.3 as we have released 5.2 already
and I think it is a bad idea to drop in bugfix releases.
(*) If someone takes over i am fine with keeping it. I don't like stuff
nobody takes care of. If we cannot maintain it, it mostlikely has issues.
And
This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am
thinking of moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in
5.2 and 6.0 releases and was hoping to hear for against arguments.
The reason for the making this move are as follows:
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
COM:
+1
mhash:
+1
sockets:
+1
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On 12/08/2006 07:03 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
COM:
mhash:
sockets:
+1 +1 +1
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of bugs
(26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
I don't think COM should be moved out. Right, it's windows only - but if
you are on windows, COM extension is most useful (I used it a number of
times and it's really
On 8-Dec-06, at 1:01 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of
bugs (26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
I don't think COM should be moved out. Right, it's windows only -
but if you are on windows, COM extension is most
Well, it does not consume any resources simply because no one is
maintaining it ;-). How really different things would be if it were in
I meant runtime resources, not developer resources. Like memory, CPU, etc :)
pecl? I mean afaik COM is not enabled by default on win32, so you still
need to
, December 08, 2006 8:03 AM
To: PHP internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Moving COM, Socket mhash to PECL
This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-).
I am thinking of moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions
to PECL in
5.2 and 6.0 releases and was hoping to hear for against arguments
Hello,
On 12/8/06, Ilia Alshanetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am
thinking of moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in
5.2 and 6.0 releases and was hoping to hear for against arguments.
The reason for the making this
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am thinking of
moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in 5.2 and 6.0 releases
and was hoping to hear for against arguments.
The reason for the making this move are as
At 21:51 08/12/2006, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am
thinking of
moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in 5.2 and 6.0 releases
and was hoping to hear for against arguments.
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:17 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On 8-Dec-06, at 1:01 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
COM:
+1, easy to install from pecl.
mhash:
sockets:
Un-maintained.
A good point for 5.2, but given that there is no one to support users
using this extension
On 12/08/2006 07:03 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
COM:
-1
COM should have more attention and I can try to find some of that.
mhash:
+1
sockets:
+1 when everything can be handled by streams
- Frank
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Well, it does not consume any resources simply because no one is
maintaining it ;-). How really different things would be if it were in
pecl? I mean afaik COM is not enabled by default on win32, so you still
need to enable it manually. So, the only extra step for
On Fri, December 8, 2006 10:03 am, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of bugs
(26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
Only usable to Win32 users, which I think we all admit are a
minority and can always download readily
20 matches
Mail list logo
