Scott MacVicar escribió:
> If you don't care don't pass a parameter.
ohh.. right, I misinterpreted it .. sorry ;)
--
"A computer is like an Old Testament god, with a lot of rules and no
mercy. "
Cristian Rodríguez R.
Platform/OpenSUSE - Core Services
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Deve
On 25 Sep 2008, at 22:59, Cristian Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Scott MacVicar escribió:
Hi All,
Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random pseudo
byte function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the bytes aren't
considered cryptographically strong, I am ho
Scott MacVicar escribió:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random pseudo
> byte function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the bytes aren't
> considered cryptographically strong, I am however considering making
> this parameter controlled.
>
> Any objectio
hi Scott,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random pseudo byte
> function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the bytes aren't considered
> cryptographically strong, I am however consid
On 03.09.2008, at 03:08, Scott MacVicar wrote:
Hi All,
Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random
pseudo byte function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the
bytes aren't considered cryptographically strong, I am however
considering making this parameter controlle
>
> This function has been in OpenSSL for 8 years and supported by every version
> since 0.9.5. It's literally just exposing the API, it's safe for inclusion
> in 5.3 in my opinion.
>
I didn't express myself very clearly. What I meant is that we should
probably add that switch for the return right
On 3 Sep 2008, at 03:33, David Coallier wrote:
2008/9/2 Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi All,
Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random
pseudo byte
function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the bytes aren't
considered
cryptographically strong, I am however
2008/9/2 Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random pseudo byte
> function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the bytes aren't considered
> cryptographically strong, I am however considering making this parameter
> controlled
Hi All,
Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random pseudo
byte function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the bytes aren't
considered cryptographically strong, I am however considering making
this parameter controlled.
Any objections to me applying this to 5.3?
S
